HomeMy WebLinkAbout605 PZ 25 Comp Plan Update Appendix 6A TMP
605 PZ 25
PZC
LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Plan Amendment Proposal
HEARING TIME AND DATE: 6:00 p.m., January 21, 2026
LOCATION: Lincoln County Courthouse, Commissioner Boardroom 3rd Floor, 925 Sage Ave.,
Kemmerer, Wyoming & Afton Planning & Development Office, 61 E. 5th Ave., Afton, Wyoming
FILE # 605 PZ 25
APPLICANT: Lincoln County Planning & Development Office
PROJECT NAME: Comprehensive Plan Update Appendix 6.A. Transportation Master Plan
PLANNER: Katie Gipson
____________________________________________________________________________________
PROPOSAL: A Proposed Plan Amendment to the Lincoln County Comprehensive Plan to replace
Appendix 6.A. Transportation Plan and adopt the Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan Dated
July 2025.
___________________________________________________________________________________
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Schedule
2. Summary PowerPoint
3. Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
___________________________________________________________________________________
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to approve
a 30 day public notice to consider adoption of File # 605 PZ 25.
PProject Schedule
Lincoln County
Transportation Master Plan
County Commissioner's Meeting
September 16, 2025
•Where We Started (Vision and Goals)
•Significant and Rapid Growth
•Growth Impacts on Traffic
•Project Planning:
•Safety
•Connectivity
•Long-term efficiency
•Recreation
•Questions
Agenda (Planning Process)
Stakeholder
Involvement
Vision and Goals
Significant and
Rapid Growth
Population approx. distribution
Lower
Valley
Area
~8,00
0
Upper
Valley
Area
~6,30
0
Cokeville
Area
~800
Kemmerer
Area
~3,000
~1,400
throughout
the rest of
the county
Rob stuff
Known & Potential Development
Rob stuff
Known & Potential Development
(North County)
Revised
Stakeholder
Estimates
Revised
Stakeholder
Estimates
(Industrial
Developments)
Assumed Employment Growth
and Estimated Population
Name
Construction
Start Year1
Estimated Workers1 Estimated Population2
Temporary Full Time Temporary Full Time
Frontier Carbon Solutions 2025 1,000 25 1,110 60
Carbon Solutions 2026 1,000 400 1,110 950
Exxon-Mobil 2024 400 225 440 530
Pacific West 2025 1,200 500 1,330 1,190
World Resources (Pending estimate) Pending 1,000 50 1,110 120
KDW Kemmerer Decarbonization Works 2026 1,000 150 1,110 360
TriSight 2026 600 150 670 360
Terra Power (Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1) 2024 1,300 250 1,440 590
Williams 2024 20 3 20 10
Rocky Mountain Power 2025 500 100 550 240
Cokeville Solar Farm (pending) Pending NA NA NA NA
Total 8,020 1,853 8,890 4,410
Countywide Growth Forecasts
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Wyoming Forecast Stakeholder Forecast (fall 2024)Revised Forecast
22,500
30,900
21,000 28,500
Impact on Traffic
Existing ADT/Level of Service
2040 ADT/Level of Service
About 50%
increase in
traffic
(higher in
Kemmerer)
Comparison to Existing AADT
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Traffic Volumes by Month (June 2023 to May 2024)
North County South County
Future AADT
Average AADT
Growth Summary
•Lots of new growth areas
•New growth maintains rural density (5 acre lots)
•New growth adds about 50% increase in traffic
•Future travel will feel similar to July traffic now,
but does not create new capacity needs
Project Benefits:
Improved Safety
Improved Capacity
Long-term efficiency
Improved Recreation
•Stakeholder feedback
•Online comment map
•Lincoln County Staff
•WYDOT STIP
•WYDOT Crash Data
Project sources
Roadway Projects
Roadway Projects (North County)
Rd 2 Etna Rd (Co Rd 110)
TYPE New Rd/Pave Rd
LOCATION Etna South Road (Co Rd 112 to
Co Rd 115)
LENGTH 2.5 miles
FUNCTIONAL
CLASS
Local (north section is minor
collector)
SPEED LIMIT Unknown
Cost Estimate: $2,560,000
Existing Cross-Section
Future Cross-Section
3
Existing Cross-SectionTYPETraffic Calming/Add Shoulder
LOCATION Muddy String Rd (from Piute Dr
to Stone Creek Ln)
LENGTH 5 miles
FUNCTIONAL
CLASS
Major Collector
SPEED LIMIT 45 mph / 35 mph (near RV park)
Cost Estimate: $6,870,000
Future Cross-Section
Rd 6 Co Rd 117 (Muddy String Rd)5
TYPE Roadway Realignment
LOCATION Co Rd 140 Johnson Ditch
LENGTH 0.3 miles
FUNCTIONAL
CLASS
Minor Collector
SPEED LIMIT Unknown
Rd 20 Realign Curve on Co Rd 140
Change in alignment but not a change in cross-section
21
Cost Estimate: $750,000
Future Cross-Section
Roadway Projects
Point Projects
Point Projects (North County)
TYPE Intersection
Improvement
LOCATION Co Rd 116/US-239 &
US-89
RECOMMENDE
D
IMPROVEMEN
TS
Paint:
•Stop bar on both
E-W approaches
(20 ft for EB, 16
ft for WB)
•Yellow centerline
for 100 ft on E
leg.
Signage: Add “Stop
Ahead” sign (W3-1A)
(100 ft upstream) on
both the EB and WB
approaches.
Cost Estimate: $4,000
Point Project 31
Point Projects
Active Transportation Projects
Active Transportation Projects
AT 2 Star Valley Ranch State Land Loop2
TYPE Trail
LOCATION
Co Rd 116 & Co Rd 117 to
Cedar Creek Rd, Cedar Creek
Rd to just east of Yellowstone
Dr, straight north to Co Rd 116
LENGTH 4.0 miles
FUNCTIONAL CLASS N/A
SPEED LIMIT N/A
Cost Estimate: $4,000,000
AT 3 Muddy String Bikeway3
TYPE Shoulder Bikeway
LOCATION Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)
LENGTH 5.0 miles
FUNCTIONAL
CLASS
Major Collector
SPEED LIMIT 45 mph / 35 mph (near RV park)
Cost Estimate: $100,000
(pavement markings only)
Active
Transportation
Projects
lincolncountywytmp.com
Thank You!
Questions?
Kemmerer Growth
2028
(With
temporary
workers)
2040 LOS
(Unadjusted)
2040 LOS
(Adjusted)
1
In partnership with
Prepared by
July 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
00 Introduction | Roadway Project Recommendations |
Active Transportation Project Recommendations |
Point Project Recommendations | Next Steps
Executive Summary 05
17
25
43
55
58
74
83
93
100
104
102
01 introduction | Vision & Goals | Stakeholder
Involvement | Public Involvement |
Planning Process
02 Introduction | Traffic Counts & Volumes | Safety |
Seasonality | Roadway Ownership | Functional
Classification | Recreation
Existing Condition
03 Introduction | County Growth | Future Roadway
Conditions
Future Conditions
04 Introduction | Final Project List & Map Overview
Proposed Plan
Roadway Projects
Active Transportation Projects
Point Projects
Non-County Projects
Cost-Estimate & Cost Benefit Analysis
Access Management
Conclusion
A County Routes Map & List | County Resolutions |
County Connectivity | Cost Estimates
Appendices
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
3
Lincoln County would like to acknowledge the contributions of many individuals and
groups who contributed to the direction of this document. This project was made
possible in part by funding from WYDOT.
Steering Committee
Lincoln County
Amy Butler, Engineer
Stephen Allen, Chief of Staff & Planning Director
Ken Kuluski, Planning Director
Destry Dearden, IT/GIS Director
Kimberly Guinta, Engineer & GIS Analyst
Kent Connelly, County Commissioner
Jerry Hansen, County Commissioner
Shane Johnson, Sheriff
Jay Hokanson, Emergency Manager
Maryanne Christensen, Dispatch/EMS
Ed Ekstrom, Managing Director Criterium
Robert King, Economic Development Director
Dave Jenkins, Travel & Tourism Board Member
Mary Crosby, Grant Writer
WYDOT
John Eddins, District Engineer
Peter Stinchcomb, Construction Engineer
Darrin Robinson, Resident Engineer - Afton
Jennifer Hoffman, Resident Engineer -
Kemmerer
Key Collaborators
Brandon Teppo, BLM Field Manager
Justin Laycock, District Ranger - Greys River
Adam Calkins, District Ranger - Kemmerer
Ryan Lyman, Director of Transportation - Lincoln
County District #2
Teresa Chaulk, Superintendent - Lincoln County
School District #1
Dan Dockstader, Senate District 16
Towns
Mayor Clint Bowen, Town of Diamondville
Mayor Bill Theck, City of Kemmerer
Brian Muir, City of Kemmerer Administrator
Dale L. Hicks, Kemmerer City Council
Mayor Larry Stepp, Town of LaBarge
Mayor Anthony Ritzdorf, Town of Opal
Maxine Ritzdorf, Town of Opal Council
Mayor Eric Green, Town of Alpine
Mayor Devin Simpson, Town of Thayne
Mayor Kathy Buyers, Town of Star Valley Ranch
Trevor Aitken, Town of SVR Administrator
Mayor Jeff Jensen, Town of Afton
Violet Sanderson, Town of Afton Administrator
Avenue Consultants Team
Thomas McMurtry, Project Manager
Kirby Snideman, Assistant Project Manager
Rob Eldredge, Transportation & GIS Analyst
Toby Lowry, Transportation & GIS Analyst
Vision & Goals MeetingAugust 2024
4
This page intentionally left blank
5
ExecutiveSummary00
GOALS OF THE PLAN6
INTRODUCTION
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
The Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan takes a close look at how people move
around the county today and identifies ways to improve safety, access, and connectivity
for everyone. This includes drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians, and others who rely on the
transportation system in their daily lives.
The plan reviews how well the current roads, pathways, and infrastructure are working and
highlights areas where updates or changes could make travel easier and more efficient.
With the county’s continued growth and changing needs, having a clear picture of the
future needs is an important step toward building a better transportation system.
The vision for this Transportation Master Plan is to collaborate for a safe and reliable
transportation network that connects people to destinations. This vision served as a
foundation throughout the planning process. The goals outlined below helped guide the
development of the plan and translate this vision into actionable priorities for Lincoln
County.
Connectivity
Create and maintain a connected road
network
AT & TRAILS
Expand the trails and active transportation
networks by exploring new routes
Safety
Improve safety for all users by evaluating
intersections and more
Funding
Seek addiitonal funding opportunities
Collaboration
Collaborate between government agencies
to plan for the future together
The final list and map of recommended
transportation projects represent the
outcome of a thorough and collaborative
planning process. These recommendations
were shaped through multiple rounds of
brainstorming sessions, detailed traffic
modeling, safety evaluations, and analysis of
projected future growth across Lincoln
County.
Public input played a key role throughout,
helping to highlight community priorities
and local concerns. Together, these efforts
led to a targeted set of projects aimed at
improving safety, enhancing mobility, and
supporting long-term growth. The maps and
accompanying lists reflect both the
technical findings and the voices of the
people who use Lincoln County’s
transportation system every day.
The final projects for this plan are divided
into three categories:
7Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Creating this plan has been
a collaborative effort,
bringing together input and
guidance from a variety of
Stakeholders attend a meeting as part of the
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan.
partners, including local jurisdictions,
regional agencies, and community
stakeholders.
Their insights helped shape the
direction of the plan and ensure that it
reflects the priorities and concerns of
the people who live and work in
Lincoln County. The result is a plan that
not only outlines important
transportation improvements but also
supports the county’s broader goals of
safety, connectivity, and quality of life.
Roadway Projects
Active Transportation
Projects
Point Projects
A map and list for each project type are
shown on the following pages.
8Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County recommended roadway
projects.
ROADWAY PROJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS
25 roadway projects proposed, totaling 60.6 miles.
Projects fall into five main categories:
Capacity Improvements: Widen roads and add shoulders
to reduce congestion and support growth.
New Road/Paving: Build new roads and pave gravel/dirt
roads to improve connectivity and year-round access
Off-Road Vehicle (ORV)
Improvements: Enhance ORV routes
with treatments, signage, and formal
paths to improve safety.
Roadway Realignment: Adjust road
layouts to improve safety and
efficiency, especially at curves and
intersections.
Safety Improvements: Implement
measures like better signage,
lighting, and speed markings to
reduce crash risks.
9
Recommended Roadway Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Cost Estimate
1 ORV Caribou Loop Trail
(North) ORV
US-89 (from McCoy Forest Rd
to Trail Dr Rd)2.8 $1,060,000
2 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Co Rd 110 North
Extension
Co Rd 110 (Steward Creek Rd to
Steward Trl)0.4 $600,000
3 New Rd /
Pave Rd Etna Rd Improvement Etna S Rd (Co Rd 112 to Co Rd
115)2.5 $2,340,000
4 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Etna S Rd Extension to
Co Rd 118
Enta S Rd (Co Rd 115 to Co Rd
118)2.0 $2,970,000
5 Safety
Improvement Muddy String Co Rd 117 Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)5.0 $6,040,000
6 Safety
Improvement
Co Rd 118 Safety
Improvement Co Rd 118 (US 89 to Co Rd 117)2.0 $2,250,000
7 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Oxbow Drive Rd
Extension Oxbow Drive to Co Rd 117 0.2 $240,000
8 New Rd /
Pave Rd Co Rd 419 Co Rd 419 (Co Rd 120 to Co Rd
122)1.5 $1,710,000
9 Safety
Improvement
Realignment of Co Rd
126 and US 89 Co Rd 126 and US 89 0.7 $1,260,000
10 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Willow Creek Lane
Extension
Willow Creek (Hellhole Rd to Co
Rd 123)2.3 $2,350,000
11 ORV Co Rd 177/123 ORV
Approx 2000 ft east of
Turnerville to 3000 ft South of
Turnerville
1.2 $310,000
12 Ownership
Change Grover to Turnerville Turnerville Rd to Co Rd 123 4.1 $6,130,000
13 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Pole Line Rd connection
(new road)
Pole Line Rd (Co Rd 136 to
WY237)3.0 $8,660,000
14 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Co Rd 136 extension
(new road)
Co Rd 136 and Kennington
Burton Rd west to SR 238 1.2 $1,240,000
15 New Rd /
Pave Rd
1st Ave extension
(new Road)
Lincoln Co Fair Rd (new) to Co
Rd 135 0.8 $1,040,000
16 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Lincoln Co Fair
(new Road)2nd Ave to Co Rd 137 0.3 $1,640,000
17 New Rd /
Pave Rd
2nd Ave extension (new
road)
2nd Ave (Swift Creek Reservoir
to Co Rd 135)0.8 $1,050,000
18 ORV Caribou Loop Trail
(South)Smiths Fork Rd to Lochawe Ln 15.1 $3,920,000
ORV
New Road/Pave Existing Road
Safety Improvement
Roadway Realignment
Capacity
Ownership Change
10
Recommended Roadway Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan (Continued)
ORV
New Road/Pave Existing Road
Safety Improvement
Roadway Realignment
Capacity
Ownership Change
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Total & Summary
The Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan includes 25 critical roadway projects
spanning 60.6 miles, underscoring the vital role of transportation infrastructure in
supporting regional growth, safety, and connectivity. These projects address key needs
across five categories. Capacity improvements will widen roadways and shoulders to
reduce congestion and accommodate rising traffic volumes. New construction and paving
of gravel or dirt roads will enhance year-round access and reliability, particularly in rural
areas. Off-road vehicle (ORV) improvements aim to improve safety and functionality for
recreational users by upgrading and formalizing existing ORV routes. Roadway
realignments will correct hazardous curves and intersections, improving safety and
efficiency. Finally, targeted safety upgrades—including better roadway markings, wider
shoulders, and speed control—will reduce crash risk and ensure safer travel for all users.
Collectively, these roadway projects are foundational to the county’s long-term
transportation strategy.
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Cost
Estimate
19 New Rd /
Pave Rd Co Rd 198 extension SR 236 to Co Rd 146 1.0 $1,590,000
20 ORV Dry Creek Rd ORV Dry Creek Rd (US 89 to Forest Rd
10209)0.8 $320,000
21 Realignment Co Rd 140 Co Rd 140 Johnson Ditch 0.3 $700,000
22 Capacity Co Rd 204 Co Rd 204 from SR 232 to Pine Creek 2.8 $4,690,000
23 Realignment Pine Creek Rd Pine Creek crossing to parking area 1.5 $2,500,000
24 Capacity Co Rd 207 Co Rd 207 (SR 231 to approx. 6 miles
south)5.5 $8,160,000
25 Realignment Co Rd 340 Curve realignment near Shute
Creek Plant 2.7 $6,750,000
$69.5 MTotal
11Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County recommended active
transportation projects.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS
11 active transportation projects proposed, totaling 46
miles.
Projects are categorized into two main types:
Shoulder Bikeways:
Paved shoulders along roadways for bicyclists and
pedestrians.
Minimum width: 6 feet.
Improve safety for all road users in areas lacking
separated facilities.
Trails (Shared Use Paths):
Comfortable, wide paths for both pedestrians and
cyclists.
May run parallel to roads or along
natural features like rivers and
parks.
Minimum width: 12 feet, with 2-
foot gravel shoulders on each side.
12
Lincoln County Recommended Active Transportation Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master
Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Road
Project?
Cost
Estimate
1 Trail Etna Nordic
Foothills
Keystone Trl to Steward
Creek Rd 4.7 NA $4,700,000
2 Trail Star Valley Ranch
State Land Loop
Co Rd 116 & Co Rd 117 to
Cedar Creek Rd, Cedar Creek
Rd to just east of
Yellowstone Dr, straight
north to Co Rd 116
4.0 NA $4,000,000
3 Shoulder
Bikeway
Muddy String
Bikeway
Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)4.9 Yes $100,000
4 Shoulder
Bikeway
Bedford
to Turnerville
Bikeway
Co Rd 123 and 177 to Co Rd
123 and Co Rd 126 4.7 No $6,500,000
5 Shoulder
Bikeway Turnerville to Grover Turnerville Rd/Co Rd 172
from US 89 to Co Rd 177 5.5 Yes $110,000
6 Shoulder
Bikeway
Pole
Line Rd Bikeway
Pole Line Rd from Co Rd 136
to WY 237 3.0 Yes $60,000
7 Shoulder
Bikeway Auburn Loop
Co Rd 133 and 1st West to
Auburn Tygee Rd, Auburn
Tygee Rd to Co Rd 133, Co
Rd 133 to 1st West
5.3 No $7,530,000
8 Shoulder
Bikeway
Afton
School Bikeway
Loop
Co Rd 135 and Co Rd 136 to
Warrior Way, Warrior Way Co
Rd 136 to Co Rd 137, Co Rd
137 Warrior Way to Co Rd
135
2.0 No $2,880,000
9 Shoulder
Bikeway Co Rd 135 Bikeway
Co Rd 135 from Co Rd 136 to
SR
236
4.0 No $5,220,000
10 Shoulder
Bikeway
Co Rd
204 Bikeway
Co Rd 204 from SR 232 to
Pine Creek Ski Resort 4.0 Yes $80,000
11 Shoulder
Bikeway Cokeville Bikeway Co Rd 207 Aprox. 4th North 3.6 No $70,000
Trail Shoulder Bikeway
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
$31.2 MTotal
13Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County recommended point
projects.
POINT PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
11 point projects are proposed as part of the plan.
Projects fall into two main categories:
Intersection Improvements:
Add or replace signs (e.g., stop, yield, warning) to
improve safety and visibility.
Refresh or install pavement markings like stop bars,
centerlines, and text (e.g., “Stop Ahead”).
Minor geometric upgrades (e.g., widening, clearing,
realignment) to improve sight distance and
maneuverability.
Aim to reduce crash risk and improve traffic flow,
especially in rural and developed areas.
Parking Improvements:
Proposed at two sites serving ATV and equestrian users.
May include expanding parking,
updating signage, and installing
fencing to formalize and improve
the lots.
14
Recommended Point Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Name Location Recommended Improvements Cost
Estimate
1
US 89 and Co Rd
116 Intersection
Improvement
US 89/
State
Highway
239
Paint - Stop Bar on both E-W approaches (16,20 ft), double
yellow paint for 100 ft on E leg; Sign - Add stop ahead sign
(W3-1A) 100ft ahead of both the EB and WB approaches
$4,000
2
US 89
and Cedar
Creek Rd
Intersection
Improvement
US 89/
Cedar
Creek
Paint - Stop Bar on EB and WB approaches (12ft for WB,
25ft for WB), Yellow paint on EB and WB approaches (50 ft
for EB and 100 ft for EB), Yield bar (12 ft) on Clearwater;
Sign - Yield sign (R1-2) on Clearwater before merge with
Troutwater, merge sign (W4-1R) on Troutwater; Pavement -
5,500 sqft of pavement on EB approach, where there is
gravel
$50,000
3
Swab Creek Rd
Parking
Improvement
Swab
Creek Rd 7,310 sqft of clearing, 18,500 sq ft of gravel $60,000
4
County
Road 127 and
123 Intersection
Improvement
Co Rd 127
/ Co Rd
123
Sign - W1-7 left/right sign, W2-2 T-intersection ahead sign
on NB and SB approaches (175' upstream), W14-4 "Limited
Visiblity sign" on WB approach (50' upstream); Paint - Stop
Bar (22 ft), Yellow Line (150 ft), "Stop Ahead" Pavement
marking (100 ft upstream)
$7,000
5
US 89 Co Rd 172
Intersection
Improvement
US 89 Co
Rd 172
Paint - Stop Bar (15 ft on WB approach, 25 ft on EB
approach), Yellow Line (100 ft on both EB and WB
approaches); Sign - W2-1 intersection ahead sign on both
NB and SB approaches (475' upstream), replace stop sign
(R1-1) to a 36" sign on metal reflective pole on both EB and
WB approaches; Pavement - 900 sq ft on NW corner of
pavement for shoulder (2" depth)
$17,000
6
Co Rd 137 and
Co Rd 135
Intersection
Improvement
Co Rd
137 / Co
Rd 135
Sign - add stop sign (R1-1) to left side (30"), Paint - stop bar
(15 ft), yellow line (150 ft), "Stop Ahead" pavement marking
(8 ft tall) on WB approach, "SPEED LIMIT 35MPH" pavement
marking (8 ft tall) on NB and SB approaches
$4,000
7
Co Rd 137 and
new road/new
intersection
(roadway project
14)
Co Rd 137
Paint - Stop Bar (15 ft), Yellow Line (100 ft); Sign - W1-1, Stop
sign, W1-7 left/right sign, W2-2 T-intersection ahead sign on
NB and SB approaches (100-ft upstream)
$5,000
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Intersection Improvement Parking Improvement
15
Recommended Point Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan (continued)
Project
ID Name Location Recommended Improvements Cost
Estimate
8
SR 236 & Co Rd
198 Intersection
Improvement
SR 238
& Co Rd
198
Sign - W1-7 left/right sign, Add stop ahead sign (W3-1A)
100ft ahead SB approach, replace stop sign (R1-1) to a 36"
SB approach, add stop sign (R1-1) to left side; Paint -
Repaint yellow line on SB approach (100 ft), paint stop bar
on SB approach (15 ft ), "Stop Ahead" Pavement marking
(100 ft upstream)
$7,000
9
US 89 and Co Rd
153 intersection
improvement
US 89 and
Co Rd 153
Sign - W2-1 intersection ahead sign on both NB and SB
approaches (475' upstream); Paint - Stop Bar (25 ft),
Yellow Line (150 ft); Pavement - 1,900 sqft of grading and
pavement to widen and realign cross streets
$20,000
10
Co Rd 153
parking
improvement
Co Rd 153 1,493 sqft of clearing, 10,000 sqft of gravel $28,000
11
SR 240 and Co
Rd 340
intersection
improvement
SR 240
and Co
Rd 340
Sign - Stop Sign to left side of CO-340 (R1-1), add stop
ahead sign (W3-1A) (150 ft Upstream); Paint - Repaint
yellow line (150 ft), paint stop bar (20 ft), "Stop Ahead"
Pavement marking (100 ft upstream)
$4,000
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Intersection Improvement Parking Improvement
$206 KTotal
16
Next Steps
Lincoln County is experiencing rapid
growth, driven by expanding employment
in the south and strong residential
development in the north. This growth is
increasing traffic and shifting travel
patterns, placing new demands on the
transportation network.
Traffic volumes are projected to rise by
37% countywide by 2040, with some
corridors potentially doubling.
Fortunately, the existing roadway system
is generally resilient and capable of
accommodating this growth without
major expansions.
The Transportation Master Plan provides a
strategic, forward-looking approach to
guide future development while
preserving the county’s rural character
and quality of life. It outlines targeted
projects focused on safety, connectivity,
and long-term efficiency—ensuring the
county is prepared for future challenges.
With this plan, Lincoln County is
positioned to manage growth sustainably,
maintain mobility, and support the well-
being of its residents.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
17
PlanningProcess01
18Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
1.2 VISION & GOALS
Figure 1.1 Project Vision & Goals
The vision and goals for this plan were
developed in close partnership with the
project’s steering committee during a
collaborative workshop held on August 29,
2024. At that meeting, committee members
shared their ideas, priorities, and values for
the vision statement and the five supporting
goals.
The vision—Collaborating for a safe and
reliable transportation network that will
connect people to destinations—captures
the shared desire for an inclusive,
dependable, and forward-thinking system.
The words and themes contributed by the
committee were used to shape this vision
and guide the entire planning process.The
vision and goals provide a clear framework
to guide decisions and keep the team
focused on Lincoln County’s priorities.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Plan was shaped through strong
collaboration with a steering committee, a
wide range of community stakeholders, and
the public. These efforts empowered
residents to share concerns, suggest
improvements, and help refine the final list
of prioritized projects. This community input
helped ensure the plan was not only data-
driven but rooted in local knowledge and
values. Together, this broad and inclusive
participation has laid the foundation for a
transportation vision as well as plan for
specific projects that reflects the needs of
Lincoln County today and into the future.
VISION & GOALS
Goal icons are included throughout this
document to highlight where specific
goals were considered and how they
helped guide decision-making.
19Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
1.3 STAKEHOLDER
INVOLVEMENT
Community stakeholder engagement was a
cornerstone of the planning process for the
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan.
Stakeholders provided essential local
knowledge and practical insight from the
earliest phases—such as shaping the plan’s
vision and goals—through to the final
development and prioritization of the
recommended project list.
Their input helped ensure that the plan is
not only technically sound but also
grounded in the real-world needs of Lincoln
County’s residents, businesses, and visitors.
To ensure a broad and
representative perspective,
stakeholders were invited
from a range of public
agencies and organizations,
including:
Wyoming Department of
Transportation (WYDOT)
Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office
Lincoln County Emergency
Management
Lincoln County School District
Bureau of Land Management
(BLM)
National Park Service (NPS)
Local city staff and elected
officials
Each stakeholder brought unique
expertise and a valuable
understanding of the county’s
transportation needs.
Visioning MeetingAug 2024
04
Stakeholder Meeting May 2025
Figure 1.2 Stakeholder meetings held as part of the
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan.
Stakeholder MeetingOct 2024
20Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
In addition to safety considerations, stakeholder insight played a critical role in shaping
the county’s growth models. Stakeholders provided updates on anticipated
developments, school expansions, public land access issues, and planned infrastructure
changes. This local input was integrated into future traffic forecasting and helped align
long-term transportation investments with projected land use and demographic trends.
Engagement with stakeholders occurred through in-person and virtual meetings, ensuring
accessibility and continuity throughout the planning process. These sessions allowed for
open dialogue between the project team and community representatives to identify
priorities, discuss constraints, and explore opportunities for implementation.
The stakeholders’
collective input helped
identify key areas where
safety improvements are
most urgently needed. In particular,
stakeholders used their on-the-ground
knowledge to pinpoint “point project”
locations—individual intersections or
segments of roadway that have a
history of crashes or are perceived to
be safety concerns. These locations
were flagged for targeted
improvements aimed at reducing
crash frequency and severity.
Once a preliminary list and map of projects
were assembled, an online project mapping
tool was launched.
This tool enabled stakeholders to further
engage by upvoting or downvoting
individual projects, submitting location-
specific comments, and refining the list to
focus on the most feasible and impactful
improvements.
Figure 1.3 Stakeholders commented on specific
locations on maps during meetings.
Figure 1.4 Online comment map highlighting
safety concerns on Muddy String Rd.
21Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
1.4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Public input played a vital role in shaping the Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan.
To ensure the plan reflected the needs, values, and lived experiences of residents across
the county, multiple opportunities for meaningful engagement were offered throughout
the planning process. The goal was to build a transportation vision informed not only by
data and technical analysis but also by the voices of the people who rely on these systems
every day.
Project website
To promote transparency and keep the
public informed, a dedicated project
website (lincolncountywytmp.com) was
developed and maintained throughout the
duration of the planning process. This
website served as a centralized hub for plan
updates, background documents, draft
maps, meeting notices, and opportunities
for feedback. By making all materials easily
accessible online, Lincoln County ensured
that residents could engage with the
planning process on their own time and at
their own pace—whether or not they were
able to attend meetings in person.
Figure 1.5 Screenshot of online comment map
highlighting safety concerns on Muddy String Rd.
Public Survey and Dashboard
Results
To broaden public input, an online survey
was launched early in the process via the
project website. It allowed residents—
especially those unable to attend in-person
events—to share feedback on transportation
challenges and priorities. Survey responses
helped identify key concerns, guide project
development, and prioritize travel modes.
An interactive dashboard displayed live
results, keeping stakeholders and the public
informed.
Figure 1.6 Interactive dashboard that displayed live
survey results. The dashboard can be viewed at:
https://shorturl.at/FQWyV.
22Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Community Open Houses
Public engagement activities were
conducted both in-person and online to
ensure a wide range of community voices
were heard. Two rounds of community open
houses were held—one at the outset of the
project (October 29th and 30th 2024) and
another near its conclusion (May 20th and
21st 2025). These meetings were held at two
separate venues one at the north end of the
county in Afton and one towards the south
end of the county in Kemmerer. These
meetings were strategically timed to both
gather community-driven ideas in the early
visioning phase and to collect feedback on
proposed projects after technical analysis
and stakeholder review. The open houses
were promoted through social media and
the newspaper to encourage broad
participation.
Figure 1.7 Community members at the Open House.
During the initial round of meetings,
attendees were invited to interact
directly with large-format printed maps
of Lincoln County. Participants could
draw directly on the maps, highlight
areas of concern, and describe in detail
what transportation improvements they
felt were most needed in their
communities. This hands-on, visual
approach empowered residents to
communicate spatial and experiential
knowledge in ways that traditional
surveys often cannot capture. It also
helped identify recurring themes—such
as safety concerns, pedestrian access,
and rural connectivity—that were then
investigated further by the project team.
Figure 1.8 Part of the Afton to Smoot map thatmembers of the public marked up to recommendproject ideas.
Interactive Meetings
23Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Final Public Input
As the planning process progressed and a
draft list of prioritized projects was
developed, the second round of public
meetings was held to gather feedback on
the proposed solutions. These sessions
included a formal presentation of the draft
transportation plan, complete with visual
displays of the proposed project maps,
lists, and evaluation criteria. Members of
the public were encouraged to review the
materials, ask questions, and provide input
on whether the identified projects aligned
with their expectations and needs.
Participants were also invited to indicate
which projects they believed should
receive higher priority, offering valuable
guidance for final plan adjustments.
The public’s feedback—whether gathered
in person, through the online survey, or via
the project website—helped the project
team and Lincoln County staff ensure the
final plan remained responsive to local
concerns. In some cases, public comments
led to adjustments in project scopes or
prioritization, while in others, they
confirmed that the plan was heading in the
right direction. Overall, the collaborative
and transparent approach to public
engagement strengthened community
buy-in and helped ensure that the
transportation master plan will serve as a
practical and widely supported guide for
future investment.
24
This page intentionally left blank
25
ExistingConditions02
26
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Existing transportation conditions create
the foundation to identify existing
deficiencies and future needs. As a part of
this process, the existing transportation
conditions were evaluated. This included a
review of traffic volumes, roadway capacity,
and roadway classification as well as road
ownership. In addition to these
considerations, crash data and safety trends
were utilized to identify patterns and
support future safety improvements.
Finally, the existing recreation uses in the
county were incorporated highlighting the
current use and limitations of facilities for
biking, walking, and Off-Highway Vehicle
(OHV) activity. Together, these elements
provide a foundational understanding of the
County’s transportation system and inform
future strategies to enhance mobility, safety,
and recreational access. 1
2.2 TRAFFIC COUNTS AND
VOLUMES
The amount of traffic or usage a
transportation facility receives helps
determine if widening or new facilities may
be required. This section reviews the
existing vehicle traffic and highway level of
service.
Annual average daily traffic (AADT) is an
estimation of how many cars travel along a
specific street segment in a day. This
number is typically derived by recording
traffic counts for an extended period on a
specific street.
After the traffic counts have concluded and
the numbers are examined and determined
to be representative of normal traffic
behavior, these counts are then used to
create an annual daily average.
Figure 2.1 US-89 in Grover, WY, between WY 238 and WY 237—one of the highest AADT segments in
Lincoln County.
27Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Figure 2.2 Roadway ownership in Lincoln
County.
Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and Key
Intersections in Lincoln County
As part of this plan traffic counts were conducted at ten key
locations, primarily in northern Lincoln County. Counts were
conducted on Wednesday, July 24th 2024 and again on
Tuesday, October 1st 2024.
The goal of recounting these locations was to see a seasonal
comparison between summer months and fall when school was
back in session.
The summer counts were typically higher than the fall counts in
the PM peak hour with the exception of the intersection of LC
135 & LC 137 that was 32% higher in the October count due the
proximity to the Star Valley high school. The AM peak hour at
this location was almost 300% higher than the July count.
28Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Traffic Counts at Key Locations
Star Valley Intersection | July 24, 2024
Thayne Intersection | July 24, 2024
Figure 2.3 Intersection counts at Star Valley (1), Thayne (2) on July 24 . 2024.th
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan 29
Figure 2.4 Intersection counts at Afton (3) Intersections on July 24 . 2024, as well as follow-up counts
(4) on all intersections on October 1 , 2024.
th
st
Traffic Counts at Key Locations
Afton Intersection | July 24, 2024
Follow Up Counts | October 1st, 2024
Roadway Level of Service (LOS) is commonly expressed as the
ratio of traffic volume to roadway capacity (V/C ratio) and
graded from A to F, similar to school grades. LOS A–C indicate
free-flowing traffic, while LOS D reflects moderate congestion
but still acceptable performance. LOS E and F are considered
failing.
For Lincoln County, LOS D is the planning goal during peak
hours, though actual LOS may vary by location. Because traffic
demand fluctuates by time of day, week, and season, roadway
capacity cannot be perfectly matched to demand.
Figure 2.5 outlines the conditions associated with each LOS
grade.
30Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Figure 2.5 Roadway level of service in
Lincoln County (left) and level of service
conditions (top).
Level of Service
A Free Flow OperationsNo wait longer than 1signal indicationDelay: 0<10seconds/vehicle
B Free Flow OperationsRare to wait more than1 signal indicationDelay: 10-20seconds/vehicle
C Stable OperationsOccasional backup of 1+signal indicationDelay: 20-33seconds/vehicle
D Close to unstableoperationsTolerable waitsDelay: 35-55seconds/vehicle
E Unstable operationsLengthy DelaysDelay: 55-80seconds/vehicle
F Very poor operationsGridlock conditionsDelay: >80seconds/vehicle
Levels of Service Conditions
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan 31
2.3 SAFETY
Existing crash data and trends helped to
identify potential safety improvements and
strategies for the Transportation Master
Plan. This section summarizes the existing
safety conditions including an evaluation of
historical trends within Lincoln County.
The highest concentration of traffic crashes
in Lincoln County occurred along state
routes, particularly US 89 near the
communities of Afton, Thayne, and Alpine.
Additionally, elevated crash rates were
observed in and around the Kemmerer and
Diamondville area.
These trends align with traffic volume data,
which indicate that these corridors
experience some of the highest average
daily traffic (ADT) counts in the county.
Crash Distribution
The months with the highest number of
crashes are July (likely due to the influx of
visitors) and during the winter months
(December and January).
There was a slight upward trend in the
number of crashes from 2019-2022,
however, crashes in 2023 fell back down
(Figure 2.6). The rise in crashes could be
attributed to a greater number of visitors
during the Covid 19 pandemic, or just an
overall population increase throughout the
county.
Figure 2.6 Distribution of crashes in Lincoln County
by year and month.
The combination of
higher vehicular volumes,
increased access points,
and mixed traffic types—
including commuter, freight, and
recreational vehicles—likely
contributes to the increased crash
frequency in these locations
These findings underscore the need
for targeted safety improvements,
such as access management
strategies, enhanced signage, and
intersection upgrades, particularly
where county roads intersect high-
traffic segments of the state
highway system.
Crash Yearly Distribution
Crash Monthly Distribution
32Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
To establish a crash baseline, the project team used crash data
from the Wyoming Department of Transportation’s (WYDOT)
crash database. The database includes all reported crashes
within the State.
Crash data were obtained for the period from January 1, 2019,
through December 2023. Overall, there were 1,954 reported
crashes within the County. Of the 1,954 crashes, 1.5% resulted in
fatalities and 4.4% resulted in serious injury, as shown in Figure
2.7.
Figure 2.8 Map of crashes in Lincoln
County between 2019-2023 classified by
severity.
Crash Severity
Figure 2.7 Graph of crashes in Lincoln
County between 2019-2023 classified by
severity.
33Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Manner of collision refers to the vehicle movements for the
vehicle(s) involved during the crash. Of all crashes, 65% (1,269)
were single-vehicle crashes. These crashes involve only one
vehicle that collides with an object or leaves the roadway.
Among these single-vehicle crashes, 32% (623) were animal-
related, highlighting the influence of local wildlife on roadway
safety. Another 33% of single-vehicle crashes fell into the
“Other” category, which includes run-off-road and fixed-object
collisions. The remaining 35% of crashes involved two or more
vehicles, with angle collisions (15%) and rear-end crashes (9%)
representing the most common types.
Figure 2.10 Map of crashes in Lincoln
County between 2019-2023 classified by
manner of collision.
Manner of Collision
Figure 2.9 Graph of crashes in Lincoln
County between 2019-2023 classified by
manner of collision.
The relative percentage of each
manner of collision is illustrated in
the figure above, emphasizing the
need for both wildlife mitigation
strategies and intersection safety
improvements. Figure 2.10 shows a
map of the manner of collisions
across the county.
34Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Safety Conclusion
The analysis of crash trends, severity, and collision types across Lincoln County
provides a data-driven foundation for identifying and prioritizing safety
improvements. High-crash corridors such as US 89 near Afton, Thayne, and Alpine
highlight the relationship between traffic volume, roadway characteristics, and crash
frequency.
These areas—where county roads intersect with high-volume state highways—would
benefit from targeted interventions including improved signage, access
management, and upgraded intersections. Several point projects target county
roads that intersect with state routes.
Furthermore, the prevalence of single-vehicle crashes, particularly those involving
wildlife, points to the need for mitigation strategies such as wildlife crossings,
fencing, and driver awareness campaigns. Seasonal patterns and recent trends,
including spikes during peak tourism and winter months, further reinforce the
importance of proactive and adaptive safety planning. By addressing both human
and environmental risk factors, the County can enhance roadway safety and better
protect residents and visitors alike.
2.4 SEASONALITY
The variation of traffic flow across months is
an important consideration in areas with a
signficant amount or recreation travel. The
County experiences a large increase in the
amount of traffic on its roads during the
summer months. Compared to the annual
average traffic volume, the summer months
of July and August see roughly 150% of
normal traffic in both the north and south
ends of the county.
Figure 2.11 Traffic Volumes by Month (June 2023 to
May 2024) by US Highway (top).
Traffic Volume by Month
35Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Figure 2.13 Weekday (top) and weekend (bottom)
traffic compared to average daily traffic in North vs
South County.
Figure 2.12 Comparison of Traffic Volumes in North
and South County.
While both the north and south county
areas experience higher traffic volumes
during the summer months, when the traffic
volumes are highest during the week vary
between the north and south areas of the
County.
The figures to the right show the weekday
or weekend traffic volumes compared to the
average daily traffic volume by month. In
the north county, weekday traffic volumes
are relatively higher than the average daily
traffic volume while weekend traffic
volumes are lower.
Conversely, in the south county weekend
traffic volumes are higher than the average
daily traffic volume while weekday traffic is
lower than the average daily traffic volume
with the exception of April and May.
Traffic Volume by Location Weekday Traffic Compared to Average
Daily Traffic
Weekend Traffic Compared to Average
Daily Traffic
36Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County is responsible for maintaining and managing
roads that fall outside the jurisdiction of municipalities, state
highways, and federally managed lands such as National Parks
and U.S. Forest Service areas. These County-managed
roadways, highlighted in green in Figure 2.14, serve as vital
connections between communities, agricultural areas,
recreational sites, and key economic hubs throughout the
region.
The County oversees approximately 310 miles of roadway,
ensuring their upkeep, safety, and accessibility for residents,
businesses, and visitors. This network includes a mix of paved
and unpaved roads that support a variety of transportation
needs, from daily commuting and freight movement to seasonal
tourism and outdoor recreation.
Figure 2.14 Roadway ownership in Lincoln
County.
2.5 ROADWAY OWNERSHIP
As the County continues to grow,
maintaining and improving this
infrastructure remains a priority to
enhance mobility, support economic
development, and ensure long-term
sustainability.
37Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Figure 2.15 Roadway functional
classification in Lincoln County.
2.6 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Roadway functional classification is a means to categorize how a
roadway functions and operates based upon a combination of
roadway characteristics. Streets provide two distinct and
competing functions: mobility and land access. As mobility
increases, land access decreases and vice versa, as shown in
Figure 2.16. Both functions are vital, and no trip is made without
both. There are four primary classifications of roadways, with
descriptions in Table 2.1.
Roadway functional classification does not define the number of
lanes required for each roadway’s automobile capacity. For
instance, a collector street may have two, three, or four lanes,
whereas an arterial street may have up to nine lanes for
motorized traffic.
The number of lanes is a function of
the expected automobile traffic
volume on the roadway and serves
as the greatest measure of roadway
capacity for vehicles.
Freeways
Freeway and expressway facilities are
provided to service long-distance
trips between cities and states. No
land access is provided by these
facilities.
38Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Arterials
Arterial facilities are designed to serve a
high level of mobility providing fast flowing
through-traffic movement but with low level
land-access service. The traffic controls and
facility designs are primarily intended to
provide efficient through movement.
Arterials frequently provide the most direct
route from A to B not only for automobiles
but also for pedestrians, bicyclists and
transit. These roads may offer wide
shoulders that can accommodate buffered
or separated bike lanes and can be choice
locations for bus stops. US-89 and US-30
are examples of important arterials within
the County.
As seen in Figure 2.15, there are no roads in Lincoln County that are
classified as a freeways. The transportation network in Lincoln County is
designed to support the community transportation vision. There are existing
opportunities to improve the system to create a transportation network that
provides viable transportation choices to residents and visitors.
Figure 2.16 Roadway mobility vs. access according
to functional classification.
Collectors
Collector facilities are intended to serve both through and land-access functions in
relatively equal proportions. For longer, through trips requiring high mobility such
facilities are inefficient.Instead they are used for shorter trips requiring increased access
to destinations.
For the bicyclist or pedestrian, collectors can offer higher level of comfort, safety, and
route choices because of lower vehicle speeds and a variety of access options to potential
destinations. SR-238, Muddy String Rd, SR-233, and SR-240 are a few examples of major
collector roadways in Lincoln County.
39Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
General Characteristics of Functional Classification
Freeway &
Expressway Arterial Collector Residential Street
1 Function Traffic movement Traffic movement,
land access
Collect & distribute
traffic between streets
& arterials, land access
Land access
2
Typical % of
Surface Street
System
Not applicable 5-10%10-20%60-80%
3 Continuity Continuous Continuous Continuous None
4 Spacing See Engineering Standards & Specifications See Engineering Standards & Specifications
5 Typical % of
VMT Not applicable 40-65%10-20%10-25%
6 Direct Land
Access None Limited: major
generators only
Restricted: some
movements
prohibited; number &
spacing of driveways
controlled
Safety controls
access
7
Minimum
Roadway
Intersection
Spacing
See jurisdiction’s engineering standards and
specifications
See jurisdictgion’s engineering standard
and specifications
8 Speed Limit See jurisdictgion’s engineering standard and
specifications
See jurisdictgion’s engineering standard
and specifications
9 Parking Prohibited Discouraged Limited Allowed
Comments
Supplements
capacity of arterial
street system &
provides high-speed
mobility
Backbone of Street
System N/A
Through traffic
should be
discouraged
Table 2.1 Functional classification characteristics summary.
Local streets primarily serve land-access functions. Local street design and control
facilitates the movement of vehicles onto and off the street system from land parcels.
Through movement is difficult and is discouraged by both the design and control of this
facility.
This level of street network is likely to provide the highest level of comfort and safety to
bicyclists and pedestrians. Local roads will have the lowest speeds and be mostly absent
of large vehicles.
Local Streets
40Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County, Wyoming, offers a variety of recreational
opportunities, but its current infrastructure for biking and multi-
use trails is limited. The county has few designated bike lanes
and formalized trails, with most cycling activity occurring on
road shoulders or within informal networks. Residents often rely
on existing roadways for cycling and walking, which can pose
safety concerns due to narrow shoulders and a lack of
dedicated paths. Despite this, there is strong community
interest in expanding bike-friendly infrastructure, particularly
through the development of wider shoulder bikeways and off-
road trails.
In contrast, Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) recreation is widespread
throughout Lincoln County. Many informal OHV trails exist along
the sides of roads, often created through repeated use rather
than formal planning. These routes provide access to public
lands and scenic areas, making OHV riding a popular activity for
residents and visitors alike. However, the lack of designated
OHV trails and clear management strategies can lead to
concerns about environmental impact, safety, and conflicts with
other road users.
Figure 2.17 Recreational trails and USFS
motorized roads in Lincoln County.
2.7 RECREATION & ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
As Lincoln County
looks toward future
transportation
planning, there is a
strong desire to enhance
recreational infrastructure by
developing safe, dedicated
spaces for biking and walking
while also considering the needs
of OHV users. Expanding
shoulder bikeways and creating
designated multi-use trails could
significantly improve access and
safety for non-motorized
travelers.
41Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
A balanced approach to managing OHV
trails—potentially through designated routes
and improved signage—would help preserve
access while addressing concerns about
sustainability and safety. By investing in a
well-planned recreational network, Lincoln
County can support both outdoor
recreation and active transportation,
enhancing quality of life for residents and
visitors alike.
Figure 2.18 Silver State Trail in Lincoln County, WY.
Source: www.lincolncountynevada.com
Figure 2.19 Pedestrian on US-89 bike trail
Figure 2.20 US-89 bike trail ends (about 2 miles)
42
This page intentionally left blank
43
FutureConditions03
44
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
This chapter presents an overview of
anticipated future conditions in Lincoln
County, with a focus on projected
population and employment growth,
potential residential developments, and
their implications for the transportation
network. Drawing from recent demographic
data, statewide forecasts, stakeholder input,
and development proposals, the chapter
outlines growth scenarios for communities
such as Diamondville, Kemmerer, and Opal.
It also introduces the assumptions used to
estimate future travel demand and the “no-
build” scenario to assess how current
infrastructure may perform under these
growth conditions. This sets the foundation
for identifying future transportation needs
and planning for long-term mobility in the
region.
Figure 3.1 Lincoln County Assumed Population Growth
Population Growth Forecast for Lincoln County
Lincoln County, Wyoming, has experienced
significant growth over the last 23 years,
with the population increasing by more than
6,300 residents countywide—representing
an impressive 43% growth overall. However,
this expansion hasn’t been uniform across
the region. The southern communities of
Diamondville, Kemmerer, and Opal haven’t
experienced the same population growth.
Over the same period, these areas have
seen a population decline of 483 people,
equating to a 14% decrease in their total
population.
Wyoming Economic Analysis
Division (EAD) Forecasts
3.2 COUNTY GROWTH
30,900
28,500
22,500
21,000
Based on input from stakeholders, growth in
Lincoln County was perceived to be low
according to both historical data and
Wyoming Economic Analysis Division (EAD)
forecasts. To gather additional information
on potential future developments, feedback
was solicited during stakeholder meetings
and two public meetings held in October in
Kemmerer and Afton.
Incorporating this input, Figure 3.2 shows
growth estimates according to pending and
potential developments known to
stakeholders. Figure 3.1 shows what this
growth looks like in terms of population
growth.
45Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Stakeholder Forecasts
Housing Growth Forecst for Lincoln County
In 2019, the Department of Administration
& Information’s Economic Analysis
Division (EAD) provided long-term
population projections for towns and cities
across Wyoming. These forecasts
anticipated steady growth in the area,
predicting the combined population of
Diamondville and Kemmerer would climb
to nearly 4,300 residents by 2040 which
is a projected increase of approximately
11% above the 2023 forecast and 43%
above the actual population estimate due
to the continued decrease since the 2019
forecasts were completed.
However, recent population trends show a
continued decline compared to the 2019
EAD forecast. By 2023, the actual
population was more than 800 residents
below the EAD’s projections, highlighting
a divergent trend from the last population
forecasts.
Figure 3.2 New Potential Residential Units - Stakeholder Forecasts.
46Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
After the stakeholder meetings, additional
growth was identified in the southern part of
Lincoln County near the Kemmerer and
Diamondville area. Most of these residential
growth areas are located within the same
development zones but represent later
phases of the proposed developments that
were not highlighted during the stakeholder
or public meetings as near-term growth.
Revised Stakeholder Growth
Figure 3.3 Revised development information in the Kemmerer and Diamondville areas.
This additional growth accounts for 1,000
more housing units beyond those identified
by stakeholders, bringing the total to over
2,300 new residential units in the Kemmerer
and Diamondville area.
Figure 3.3 shows the locations of these
newly identified growth areas.
Residential Growth
47Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
In addition to these areas, forecasted
employment totals were provided for
Lincoln County based on known
developments. These forecasts are
summarized in the table below, along with
the estimated population associated with
these developments. The population
estimates are derived from assumptions
outlined in the Wyoming Industrial Siting
Application for the Kemmerer Power Station
Unit 1. Temporary construction workers are
expected to relocate to the area for the
duration of their employment, while long-
term operations workers are anticipated to
reside in the area permanently, either
through local hiring or permanent
relocation.
Table 3.1 Assumed employment growth and estimated population.
Few temporary operations workers are
expected to bring family members; however,
for analysis purposes, it is assumed that 5
percent of this workforce would be
accompanied by family. For long-term
operations workers, it is estimated that
approximately 64 percent—based on the
2023 U.S. family household average—would
bring family members. The total
employment figures and estimated
population impacts are detailed in the table
below.
Employment Growth
Name Construction
Start Year1
Estimated Workers2 Estimated Population3
Temporary Full Time Temporary Full Time
Fontier Carbon Solutions 2025 1,000 25 1,110 60
Carbon Solutions 2026 1,000 400 1,110 950
Exxon-Mobil 2024 400 225 440 530
Pacific West 2025 1,200 500 1,330 1,190
World Resources (pending estimate)Pending 1,000 50 1,110 120
KDW Kemmerer Decarbonization
Works 2026 1,000 150 1,110 360
TriSight 2026 600 150 670 360
Terra Power (Kemmerer Power
Station (Unit 1)2024 1,300 250 1,440 590
Williams 2024 20 3 20 10
Rocky Mountain Power 2025 500 100 550 240
Cokeville Solar Farm (Pending Pending N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 8,020 1,853 8,890 4,410
48
The figure below illustrates the projected
population growth associated with the
anticipated projects. The graph presents
two scenarios: one where all temporary
workers reside within Lincoln County, and
another where temporary workers are
distributed across Lincoln, Uinta, and
Sweetwater counties, following assumptions
from the Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1
application. According to the application,
60% of the peak construction workforce is
expected to reside outside Lincoln County,
while the entire long-term workforce is
assumed to settle within Lincoln County.
These projections assume a five-year build-
out timeline for all projects starting in their
respective construction years, as detailed
phasing information was not provided with
the exception of the TerraPower application.
Figure 3.4 Diamondville, Kemmerer & Opal revised population growth.
Population Growth Long-term population is projected to
increase by approximately 170%, while
short-term population is expected to grow
by over 210% compared to the existing area
population. Based on Lincoln County's
current average of 2.04 people per housing
unit, the anticipated population growth by
2040 will necessitate around 2,100 new
residential units, aligning closely with the
revised stakeholder estimate of 2,350 units
which area assumed to be completed by the
year 2040. Based on the project phasing for
the anticipated and approved residential
developments, it is likely that temporary
workers will reside outside the county
during the peak construction years,
especially those developments near or
outside the county like the Pacific Soda
development.
Revised Population Growth for South Lincoln County
(Kemmerer, Diamondville and Opal areas)
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
49
The population forecasts based upon
updated residential and employment data in
the Diamondville, Kemmerer, and Opal area
resulted in a small increase in the
countywide population estimate. The
county population forecast for the year
2040 was revised from 28,500 residents
based upon the initial stakeholder input to
30,900 residents with the additional growth
near Kemmerer and Diamondville.
Countywide Growth
Figure 3.5 Adjusted population forecast for Lincoln County.
The employment growth with construction
year shows near-term growth due to the
number of temporary workers that relocate
to the area with a projected peak in 2028
which corresponds to the year for peak
employment at the TerraPower
development. The figure below shows the
adjusted population forecast.
Adjusted Population Growth for Lincoln County
30,900
28,500
22,500
21,000
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
50
Based upon the forecast growth within the county, future traffic
volumes were estimated to evaluate traffic conditions without
any improvements to the transportation network in the county.
This “no-build” scenario is used to identify any potential
capacity improvement that maybe required to roadways within
the county to accommodate the anticipated future population
and employment growth.
The map shows the 2040 level of service for Lincoln County
based on the revised growth forecasts in the southernLincoln
county. With this revised growth, the level of service is
anticipated to remain at LOS C or better for the majority of
roads throughout Lincolnthe County. Segments of US-89
through Afton and Alpine become LOS D. A short segment of
US-189 between US 30 and Moose Street in Kemmerer also
becomes LOS D if the existing roadway infrastructure is
unchanged.
Figure 3.6 Countywide Year 2040 Level of
Service – revised growth forecasts.
3.3 FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Projected Volumes
Based upon the analysis, all county
roads are expected to be LOS C or
better indicating that there are no
corridor type capacity improvements
that will be required to county roads.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
51
Although at a corridor level there are no
capacity needs, county intersections were
also evaluated with to identify what if any
capacity needs exist at these intersections
with expected future growth.
Traffic operations analysis was performed at
key intersections within Lincoln County,
using the Synchro microsimulation analysis
tool.
Volumes and Level of Service
Table 3.2 Existing and forecasted (2040) level of
service at key intersections.
Intersections Existing AM 2040 AM Existing PM 2040 PM
Muddy String Rd (LC 117) &
Cedar Creek Rd (LC 118) A / 7.8 (NB) A / 8.4 (NB) A / 8.1 (EB) A / 9.1 (EB)
Muddy String Rd (LC 117) &
Perkins Rd (LC 119) A / 9.5 (WB) B / 10.5 (WB) B / 10.2 (WB) B / 12.2 (WB)
Muddy String Rd (LC
117)/Alpenglow Dr & Clark
Ln Rd (LC 115)
A / 8.8 (WB) A / 8.5 (WB) A / 9.1 (WB) A / 9.1 (WB)
State Line Rd (LC 114) & ID
SH-34/LC 184 A / 8.7 (EB) A / 9.5 (WB) A / 8.8 (EB) B / 10.1 (WB)
Main St (US 89) & Roberts
St (LC 125)/Hemmert Dr B / 12.5 (WB) C / 19.4 (WB) C / 15.3 (WB) C / 24.2 (WB)
Silver Spring Ln/Muddy
String Rd (LC 117) & Thayne
Bedford Rd (LC 122)
A / 9.2 (SB) B / 11.2 (NB) B / 13.1 (NB) B / 14.9 (NB)
Strawberry Creek Rd (LC
126) & Thayne Bedford Rd
(LC 122)
A / 8.8 (SB) A / 9.1 (SB) A / 9.2 (SB) A / 9.8 (SB)
Bedford Turnerville Rd (LC
123) & Strawberry Creek Rd
(LC 126)
A / 8.9 (NB) A / 9.4 (NB) A / 9 (NB) A / 9.5 (NB)
Allred Rd (LC 135) & Swift
Creek Ln (LC 137) A / 8.7 (WB) A / 9 (WB) A / 9 (WB) A / 9.4 (WB)
WY 241 & Dry Creek Rd (LC
146) A / 9.4 (EB) B / 10.2 (EB) A / 9.4 (EB) B / 10.2 (EB)
This allowed for inputs such as traffic
volumes, lane configuration, intersection
control, truck percentage and peak hour
factors to be used to determine delay and
level of service for this study intersections.
Existing AM and PM peak hour volumes
were used to perform this analysis, in
addition to forecasted future 2040 volumes
to understand how any future planned
growth would impact operations at these
intersections. Today, these intersections are
controlled with stop signs.
The table and figures below shows that all
intersections operate at LOS C or better.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
52
Figure 3.7 Afternoon level of service at key intersections – existing conditions (top) vs. projected 2040
conditions (bottom).
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
53
In addition to the level of service analysis,
the future traffic volumes were screened
against the Highway Capacity Manual
(HCM) peak hour traffic signal warrants,
and 4-hour warrant well as well as planning
level guidelines from the National
Cooperative Highway Research Program
(NCHRP) Report 835 Planning and
Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide
to the Highway Capacity Manual.
Figure 3.8 below shows these NCHRP
guidelines and forecast 2040 peak hour
traffic volumes as green dots for each
evaluated intersection and traffic control
thresholds.
All evaluated intersections have future traffic
volumes in the area where two-way stop
control sufficient and is consistent with the
signal warrant analysis that showed no
intersections meet the warrants for which
data was collected. These screening results
along with the level of service analysis
indicating traffic signals are not warranted
and existing stop control at these
intersections is sufficient.
Figure 3.8 NCHRP guidelines from the 35 Planning and Preliminary Engineering
Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual, with forecasted 2040 peak hour
traffic volumes shown as green dots.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
54
This page intentionally left blank
55
ProposedPlan04
56
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The maps and tables below provide a
comprehensive set of recommended
projects aimed at enhancing transportation
safety, accessibility, and functionality across
Lincoln County. The recommendations are
organized into three primary categories—
roadway projects, active transportation
projects, and point (or spot) improvements
—each tailored to address specific needs
identified through public and stakeholder
input, data analysis, and field assessments.
Roadway projects include capacity
enhancements, new road construction,
paving of gravel routes, off-road vehicle
improvements, and realignment and safety
upgrades to support year-round access and
regional mobility.
Active transportation projects focus on
improving conditions for pedestrians and
cyclists through shoulder widening and new
off-road trail connections.
Point projects target localized concerns,
such as intersections and parking areas,
where smaller-scale improvements can have
a significant impact.
Together, these projects provide a
coordinated strategy to support growth,
improve safety, and promote a more
multimodal, resilient transportation network
for the future.
4.2 FINAL PROJECT LIST
AND MAP OVERVIEW
The recommended projects in this
transportation master plan are thoughtfully
organized into three distinct categories:
roadway projects, active transportation
projects, and point projects (also referred to
as spot improvements). Each category
addresses specific transportation needs and
priorities identified through stakeholder
input, public input, data analysis, and field
assessments (traffic counts) conducted
throughout the planning process.
Roadway Projects
Roadway projects encompass a wide range
of initiatives designed to improve the overall
function and safety of the transportation
network. These include efforts to expand
roadway capacity, construct new road
segments, or pave existing dirt and gravel
roads to enhance year-round accessibility.
Several projects aim to improve travel
conditions for off-road vehicles, while
others focus on addressing roadway
alignment issues, improving sight lines, or
mitigating hazards. Safety enhancements
are a major theme across these projects,
and one proposed project even includes a
potential change in roadway ownership to
better align jurisdictional responsibilities
with maintenance and funding capabilities.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
57
Active transportation projects are tailored
to improve conditions for non-motorized
travelers, particularly cyclists and
pedestrians. The majority of these projects
involve widening roadway shoulders to
create designated shoulder bikeways,
thereby improving safety and comfort for
users without impacting the main vehicular
travel lanes.
In addition to these on-road improvements,
the plan proposes two standalone trail
projects that are completely separate from
the roadway. These off-road trails aim to
enhance connectivity for recreational users
and provide alternative travel routes for
non-motorized transportation.
Active Transportation
Projects
Point Projects
Point projects focus on specific locations
where targeted improvements can have a
significant impact. These are generally
smaller in scope but play a critical role in
addressing localized issues. Most of the
proposed point projects involve intersection
enhancements intended to improve traffic
flow and reduce collision risk. Two projects
in this category propose parking
improvements to improve access at key
destinations.
Together, these project categories form a
comprehensive approach to transportation
planning that balances the needs of
motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and other
users while promoting safety, accessibility,
and long-term infrastructure sustainability.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
58
Figure 4.1 Lincoln County recommended
roadway projects.
4.3 ROADWAY PROJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS
There are 25 roadway projects, totaling 60.6 miles proposed as
part of this plan. The roadway projects are broken into the five
categories described below.
Capacity Improvement
These projects are intended to accommodate increasing traffic
volumes by widening existing roadways. This will be done
primarily by adding roadway shoulders where they do not exist
and widening travel lanes.
The goal is to reduce congestion,
improve travel times, and support
regional growth and development.
New Road/
Paving of Gravel
or Dirt Road
This category includes the
construction of entirely new road
segments and the paving of
existing gravel or dirt roads.
These improvements aim to
enhance connectivity, reduce
vehicle wear-and-tear, and
provide more reliable, year-round
access—especially in rural or
underdeveloped areas.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
59
Figure 4.2 Northern Lincoln County –
recommended active transportation
projects detail
Roadway Realignment
Realignment projects address
areas where the existing
roadway layout poses safety or
efficiency concerns, such as
sharp curves or poorly
designed intersections.
These changes improve sight
distance, reduce crash risk, and
enhance overall road geometry.
Safety Improvements
These projects focus on
mitigating roadway hazards
through measures such as in-
lane speed limit markings,
shoulder widening, lighting
enhancements, and improved
signage. Their purpose is to
reduce accident rates and
enhance the safety of all road
users.
Off-Road Vehicle
Improvements
These projects are designed to
support both recreational and
functional use of off-road
vehicles.
ORV paths currently exist in
parallel to many roadways in
Lincoln County and specific
paths have been identified that
need additional maintenance or
should be formalized to improve
safety.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
60
Table 4.1 Recommended Roadway Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Cost Estimate
1 ORV Caribou Loop Trail
(North) ORV
US-89 (from McCoy Forest Rd
to Trail Dr Rd)2.8 $1,060,000
2 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Co Rd 110 North
Extension
Co Rd 110 (Steward Creek Rd to
Steward Trl)0.4 $600,000
3 New Rd /
Pave Rd Etna Rd Improvement Etna S Rd (Co Rd 112 to Co Rd
115)2.5 $2,340,000
4 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Etna S Rd Extension to
Co Rd 118
Enta S Rd (Co Rd 115 to Co Rd
118)2.0 $2,970,000
5 Safety
Improvement Muddy String Co Rd 117 Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)5.0 $6,040,000
6 Safety
Improvement
Co Rd 118 Safety
Improvement Co Rd 118 (US 89 to Co Rd 117)2.0 $2,250,000
7 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Oxbow Drive Rd
Extension Oxbow Drive to Co Rd 117 0.2 $240,000
8 New Rd /
Pave Rd Co Rd 419 Co Rd 419 (Co Rd 120 to Co Rd
122)1.5 $1,710,000
9 Safety
Improvement
Realignment of Co Rd
126 and US 89 Co Rd 126 and US 89 0.7 $1,260,000
10 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Willow Creek Lane
Extension
Willow Creek (Hellhole Rd to Co
Rd 123)2.3 $2,350,000
11 ORV Co Rd 177/123 ORV
Approx 2000 ft east of
Turnerville to 3000 ft South of
Turnerville
1.2 $310,000
12 Ownership
Change Grover to Turnerville Turnerville Rd to Co Rd 123 4.1 $6,130,000
13 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Pole Line Rd connection
(new road)
Pole Line Rd (Co Rd 136 to
WY237)3.0 $8,660,000
14 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Co Rd 136 extension
(new road)
Co Rd 136 and Kennington
Burton Rd west to SR 238 1.2 $1,240,000
15 New Rd /
Pave Rd
1st Ave extension
(new Road)
Lincoln Co Fair Rd (new) to Co
Rd 135 0.8 $1,040,000
16 New Rd /
Pave Rd
Lincoln Co Fair
(new Road)2nd Ave to Co Rd 137 0.3 $1,640,000
17 New Rd /
Pave Rd
2nd Ave extension (new
road)
2nd Ave (Swift Creek Reservoir
to Co Rd 135)0.8 $1,050,000
18 ORV Caribou Loop Trail
(South)Smiths Fork Rd to Lochawe Ln 15.1 $3,920,000
ORV
New Road/Pave Existing Road
Safety Improvement
Roadway Realignment
Capacity
Ownership Change
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
61
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Cost
Estimate
19 New Rd /
Pave Rd Co Rd 198 extension SR 236 to Co Rd 146 1.0 $1,590,000
20 ORV Dry Creek Rd ORV Dry Creek Rd (US 89 to Forest Rd
10209)0.8 $320,000
21 Realignment Co Rd 140 Co Rd 140 Johnson Ditch 0.3 $700,000
22 Capacity Co Rd 204 Co Rd 204 from SR 232 to Pine Creek 2.8 $4,690,000
23 Realignment Pine Creek Rd Pine Creek crossing to parking area 1.5 $2,500,000
24 Capacity Co Rd 207 Co Rd 207 (SR 231 to approx. 6 miles
south)5.5 $8,160,000
25 Realignment Co Rd 340 Curve realignment near Shute
Creek Plant 2.7 $6,750,000
Table 4.2 Recommended Roadway Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan (Continued)
ORV
New Road/Pave Existing Road
Safety Improvement
Roadway Realignment
Capacity
Ownership Change
$69.5 MTotal
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
62Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
63Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
64Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
65Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
66Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
Project Cross-Sections
67Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
68Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
69Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
70Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
71Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
72Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
73Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project Cross-Sections
74Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
75
Figure 4.3 Lincoln County recommended
active transportation projects.
4.4 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS
There are 11 active transportation projects totaling 46 miles
proposed as part of this plan. The active transportation (AT)
projects are broken into the two categories described below.
Shoulder Bikeway
This is a paved shoulder along a roadway that can be enhanced
to serve as a functional space for bicyclists and pedestrians to
travel in the absence of other facilities with more separation.
This facility will improve safety for motorists as well.
Shoulders used for cyclists and pedestrians should be a
minimum of six feet wide.
Trail or Shared Use Path
These are often regarded as the
most comfortable options within
the context of active
transportation. They offer ample
space for pedestrians and cyclists
and are situated at a considerable
distance from the road. The
alignment of shared use paths is
not always parallel to the roadway
and may follow other features,
such as rivers and parks. They may
also be positioned closer and
parallel to the roadway and
separated by a park strip, curb, or
barrier. Trails should be at least 12
feet wide with a 2 foot gravel
shoulder on either side.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
76
Figure 4.4 Northern Lincoln County –
recommended active transportation
projects detail
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
77
Table 4.3 Lincoln County Recommended Active Transportation Projects – Lincoln County Transportation
Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles Road
Project?
Cost
Estimate
1 Trail Etna Nordic
Foothills
Keystone Trl to Steward
Creek Rd 4.7 NA $4,700,000
2 Trail Star Valley Ranch
State Land Loop
Co Rd 116 & Co Rd 117 to
Cedar Creek Rd, Cedar Creek
Rd to just east of
Yellowstone Dr, straight
north to Co Rd 116
4.0 NA $4,000,000
3 Shoulder
Bikeway
Muddy String
Bikeway
Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)4.9 Yes $100,000
4 Shoulder
Bikeway
Bedford
to Turnerville
Bikeway
Co Rd 123 and 177 to Co Rd
123 and Co Rd 126 4.7 No $6,500,000
5 Shoulder
Bikeway Turnerville to Grover Turnerville Rd/Co Rd 172
from US 89 to Co Rd 177 5.5 Yes $110,000
6 Shoulder
Bikeway
Pole
Line Rd Bikeway
Pole Line Rd from Co Rd 136
to WY 237 3.0 Yes $60,000
7 Shoulder
Bikeway Auburn Loop
Co Rd 133 and 1st West to
Auburn Tygee Rd, Auburn
Tygee Rd to Co Rd 133, Co
Rd 133 to 1st West
5.3 No $7,530,000
8 Shoulder
Bikeway
Afton
School Bikeway
Loop
Co Rd 135 and Co Rd 136 to
Warrior Way, Warrior Way Co
Rd 136 to Co Rd 137, Co Rd
137 Warrior Way to Co Rd
135
2.0 No $2,880,000
9 Shoulder
Bikeway Co Rd 135 Bikeway
Co Rd 135 from Co Rd 136 to
SR
236
4.0 No $5,220,000
10 Shoulder
Bikeway
Co Rd
204 Bikeway
Co Rd 204 from SR 232 to
Pine Creek Ski Resort 4.0 Yes $80,000
11 Shoulder
Bikeway Cokeville Bikeway Co Rd 207 Aprox. 4th North 3.6 No $70,000
Trail Shoulder Bikeway
$31.2 MTotal
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
78Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
79Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
80Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
81Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
82Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Active Transportation Project Cross-Sections
83Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
84
Figure 4.5 Lincoln County recommended
point projects.
4.5 POINT PROJECTS
There are 11 point projects proposed as part of this plan. The
point projects are broken into the following categories:
Intersection Improvements
As part of this transportation master plan, a series of targeted
intersection improvements are proposed to enhance safety,
visibility, and traffic flow throughout the network. These
improvements are focused on increasing driver awareness.
They primarily include the addition or replacement of regulatory
and warning signs such as stop signs, yield signs, intersection
ahead signs, and 'stop ahead' or 'limited visibility' warnings.
Pavement markings will also be
refreshed or added, including stop
bars, yellow centerlines, and
pavement text markings like “Stop
Ahead” and speed advisories, which
are designed to guide driver
behavior and reinforce signage. Many
intersections will undergo minor
geometric upgrades, such as
clearing, pavement widening, and
realignment to improve sight
distances and maneuverability.
Altogether, these intersection
upgrades are intended to reduce the
risk of crashes, improve traffic
efficiency, and enhance the overall
user experience for drivers
navigating through both rural and
more developed areas of the
transportation system.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
85
Figure 4.6 Northern Lincoln County –
recommended point projects detail.
Parking Improvements
Parking improvements are
proposed at two locations that
serve ATV and equestrian use.
These lots may need to be
enlarged to provide more
parking, have signage updated
and fencing installed to
formalize the parking area.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
86
Table 4.4 Recommended Point Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Name Location Recommended Improvements Cost
Estimate
1
US 89 and Co Rd
116 Intersection
Improvement
US 89/
State
Highway
239
Paint - Stop Bar on both E-W approaches (16,20 ft), double
yellow paint for 100 ft on E leg; Sign - Add stop ahead sign
(W3-1A) 100ft ahead of both the EB and WB approaches
$4,000
2
US 89
and Cedar
Creek Rd
Intersection
Improvement
US 89/
Cedar
Creek
Paint - Stop Bar on EB and WB approaches (12ft for WB,
25ft for WB), Yellow paint on EB and WB approaches (50 ft
for EB and 100 ft for EB), Yield bar (12 ft) on Clearwater;
Sign - Yield sign (R1-2) on Clearwater before merge with
Troutwater, merge sign (W4-1R) on Troutwater; Pavement -
5,500 sqft of pavement on EB approach, where there is
gravel
$50,000
3
Swab Creek Rd
Parking
Improvement
Swab
Creek Rd 7,310 sqft of clearing, 18,500 sq ft of gravel $60,000
4
County
Road 127 and
123 Intersection
Improvement
Co Rd 127
/ Co Rd
123
Sign - W1-7 left/right sign, W2-2 T-intersection ahead sign
on NB and SB approaches (175' upstream), W14-4 "Limited
Visiblity sign" on WB approach (50' upstream); Paint - Stop
Bar (22 ft), Yellow Line (150 ft), "Stop Ahead" Pavement
marking (100 ft upstream)
$7,000
5
US 89 Co Rd 172
Intersection
Improvement
US 89 Co
Rd 172
Paint - Stop Bar (15 ft on WB approach, 25 ft on EB
approach), Yellow Line (100 ft on both EB and WB
approaches); Sign - W2-1 intersection ahead sign on both
NB and SB approaches (475' upstream), replace stop sign
(R1-1) to a 36" sign on metal reflective pole on both EB and
WB approaches; Pavement - 900 sq ft on NW corner of
pavement for shoulder (2" depth)
$17,000
6
Co Rd 137 and
Co Rd 135
Intersection
Improvement
Co Rd
137 / Co
Rd 135
Sign - add stop sign (R1-1) to left side (30"), Paint - stop bar
(15 ft), yellow line (150 ft), "Stop Ahead" pavement marking
(8 ft tall) on WB approach, "SPEED LIMIT 35MPH"
pavement marking (8 ft tall) on NB and SB approaches
$4,000
7
Co Rd 137 and
new road/new
intersection
(roadway project
14)
Co Rd 137
Paint - Stop Bar (15 ft), Yellow Line (100 ft); Sign - W1-1,
Stop sign, W1-7 left/right sign, W2-2 T-intersection ahead
sign on NB and SB approaches (100-ft upstream)
$5,000
Intersection Improvement Parking Improvement
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
87
Table 4.4 Recommended Point Projects – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan (continued)
Project
ID Name Location Recommended Improvements Cost
Estimate
8
SR 236 & Co Rd
198 Intersection
Improvement
SR 238
& Co Rd
198
Sign - W1-7 left/right sign, Add stop ahead sign (W3-1A)
100ft ahead SB approach, replace stop sign (R1-1) to a 36"
SB approach, add stop sign (R1-1) to left side; Paint -
Repaint yellow line on SB approach (100 ft), paint stop bar
on SB approach (15 ft ), "Stop Ahead" Pavement marking
(100 ft upstream)
$7,000
9
US 89 and Co Rd
153 intersection
improvement
US 89 and
Co Rd 153
Sign - W2-1 intersection ahead sign on both NB and SB
approaches (475' upstream); Paint - Stop Bar (25 ft), Yellow
Line (150 ft); Pavement - 1,900 sqft of grading and
pavement to widen and realign cross streets
$20,000
10
Co Rd 153
parking
improvement
Co Rd 153 1,493 sqft of clearing, 10,000 sqft of gravel $28,000
11
SR 240 and Co
Rd 340
intersection
improvement
SR 240
and Co
Rd 340
Sign - Stop Sign to left side of CO-340 (R1-1), add stop
ahead sign (W3-1A) (150 ft Upstream); Paint - Repaint
yellow line (150 ft), paint stop bar (20 ft), "Stop Ahead"
Pavement marking (100 ft upstream)
$4,000
Intersection Improvement Parking Improvement
$206 KTotal
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
88Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
89Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
90Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
91Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
92Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Point Project Cross-Sections
93Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
94
Figure 4.7 Non-county roadway project
ideas.
4.6 NON-COUNTY
PROJECTS
Throughout the planning process,
stakeholders and community
members contributed a wide range
of valuable project ideas. While
many of these concepts aligned
with Lincoln County’s scope, others
fell outside the County’s
jurisdiction—falling instead within
the right-of-way or regulatory
authority of WYDOT or various
municipal governments.
Although Lincoln County does not
have the authority to directly
implement these projects, their
inclusion in this plan reflects the
County’s recognition of their
importance. Documenting these
ideas ensures they are preserved
for potential collaboration and
future implementation by the
appropriate agencies.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
95
Table 4.5 Non-county Roadway Project Ideas – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles
1 Connectivity West Alpine Connectivity
Improvement
US 89 & Old Alpine Rd to Palisades Reservoir
Co Rd 101 2.3
2 ORV Trail Drive Rd & Greys
River Rd
Trail Drive Rd & Greys River Rd (US 89 to
Forest Rd 10022A)1.3
3 Capacity US 89 Star Valley Capacity
improvement US 89 (Co Rd 115 to Co Rd 118)2.1
4 Unknown Vista East/Vista West Dr Thayne Fire dept to Vista E Dr 1.7
5 Unknown Vista Dr Vista Dr (Walnut Dr to Hillside Way)0.8
6 Capacity US 89 Capacity
Improvement US 89 (Co Rd 128 to Co Rd 126)2.5
7 Capacity US 89 Capacity
Improvement US 89 (Outfitter Rd to Co Rd 136)2.3
8 Connectivity Rockbridge Dr
extention (new road)Rockbridge Dr (Center St to Twin Cliffs Rd)1.2
9 Connectivity Sessions Ln extention
(new road)Sessions Lane (Center St to Twin Cliffs Rd)1.2
10 Safety
Improvement
US 89 Safety
Improvement through
Afton
US 89 (Rocky Rd to Center St)0.8
11 Connectivity 2nd Ave Extension (new
road)2nd Ave (Swift Creek Reservoir to Co Rd 135)2.1
Tier 2 Non-County Roadway Projects
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
96
Figure 4.8 Non-county active
transportation project ideas.
Non-County Active Transportation Project
Ideas
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
97
Table 4.6 Non-county Active Transportation Project Ideas – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Miles
1 Trail US 89 Alpine Trail US 89 (State border to Short St)3.2
2 Trail Alpine Village Circ Palisades Dr and US 26 to Alpine Village Circ
and Co Rd 100 1.6
3 Trail Snake River Trail (South)Palisades Resevoir Rd to Nelson Ln 2.9
4 Trail SR 232 Trail (North)SR 232 Co Rd 305 to Co Rd 204 9.5
5 Trail Greys River Loop Forest Rd 10022 & Forest Rd 10138 1.3
6 Trail US 89 Wapiti Village RV Park
to Etna US 89 Wapiti Village Loop to Co Rd 169 7.0
7 Trail US 89 Etna to Thayne Dana St to Co Rd 169 8.1
8 Trail Star Valley RV trail Hardman Rd to RV Park (From Transportation
Alternative Plan Star Valley)1.0
9 Trail Vista Dr Trail Vista Dr Cedar Creek Dr to Hillside way 0.8
10 Trail Pine Ave/Central Ave Trail Pine Ave and Canyon Rd to US 189 and Central
Ave 2.4
11 Trail US 89 Thayne to Grover County Rd 190 to Dana St 10.0
12 Trail US 89 Grover to Afton Co Rd 190 to 2nd Ave Afton 4.2
13 Trail Grover to Afton Foothills Trail Turnerville Rd to 5th Ave Afton 5.6
14 Trail Afton Foothills Trail 2nd Ave to Aprox. 10th Ave 1.0
15 Trail US 89 Afton to Osmond US 89 2nd Ave to Co Rd 156 3.5
16 Trail Star Valley Ranch Canal Trail Star Valley Ranch Canal 4.3
17 Trail SR 238 SR 238 From Co Rd 135 to US 89 1.0
18 Trail US 89 Trail Osmond to Smoot US 89 Co Rd 156 to SR 241 3.2
19 Shoulder
Bikeway SR 232 Trail (South)SR 232 from US 30 to Co Rd 204 Junction 2.9
20 Trail SR 233 Trail SR 233 US 189 to Viva Naughton Reservoir 13.9
21 Trail SR 236 Trail SR 236 From Co Rd 198 to SR 89 1.1
22 Trail Snake River Trail (North)Palisades Resevoir Rd to US 89 and Colonial Ln 2.6
23 Trail Canyon Rd Trail Canyon Rd StoweAway Storage to Garnet St
through undeveloped land to Hams Fork Dr 1.8
24 Trail Future Development internal
loop
Canyon Rd approx StoweAway Storage to
Canyon Rd and US 189 1.3
Tier 2 Non-County Active Transportation Projects
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
98
Figure 4.9 Non-county active
transportation project ideas.
Non-County Point Project Ideas
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
99
Table 4.7 Non-county Point Project Ideas – Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Project
ID Type Name Location Description
1 Parking
Improvement
Greys River Rd Parking
Improvement
Greys River Rd/Nelson
Ln TH Improve
2 Crossing
Improvement 89 Tunnel US 89/Morning Star Dr Tunnel
3 Transit Hub
Improvement Travel Hub Improvement County Rd 101/US 89 Travel Hub
4 Parking
Improvement
McCoy Forest Rd
Parking Improvement McCoy Forest Rd/US 89 Parking
5 Safety
Improvement
US 89 Safety
Improvement (Co Rd 115)
County Road 115 and US
89 3, 4 lane bad accidents
6 Intersection
Improvement
US 89 and SR 238
Intersection Improvement US 89 and SR 238 Limited Visibility
7 Intersection
Improvement
US 89 and Center St
intersection improvement US 89 and Center St Intersection Safety
8 Intersection
Improvement
US 89 and Co Rd 137
Intersection Improvement US 89 and Co Rd 137 Intersection Safety
9 Intersection
Improvement
US 89 and 1st Ave
Intersection Improvement US 89 and 1st Ave Intersection Safety
10 Crossing
Improvement
US 89 and aprox. 7th
Ave Intersection
Improvement
US 89 and aprox. 7th
Ave
AT crossing to connect to
sidewalk on E side of Road
11 Crossing
Improvement
US 189 and Aspen Avenue
Crossing Improvement
US 189 and Aspen
Avenue
Improved bike/ped crossing to
fishing pond and walking trail
Tier 2 Non-County Point Projects
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
100
4.7 COST ESTIMATES AND
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The cost estimates for the Lincoln County
Transportation Master Plan were developed
using a detailed and methodical approach
to account for the broad range of proposed
transportation infrastructure improvements.
These estimates incorporated current unit
costs and 2024 bid prices for typical
construction items such as clearing and
grubbing, roadway excavation, paving
materials (including HMA and chip seal),
striping, signage, drainage, and structural
elements like culverts.
Additionally, specific percentages were
allocated for key non-itemized costs,
including a 30% added contingency, 10% for
mobilization, and 16% each for
preconstruction and construction
engineering, ensuring a more holistic cost
representation.
Design and material quantity assumptions
were also central to the estimating process.
Factors like HMA thickness, aggregate layer
depths, roadway excavation depths, lane
and shoulder widths, and cross-sectional
widths were tailored for each roadway
classification, from local gravel roads to
state highways and trails These detailed
cross-sections allowed for volume-based
calculations and unit-rate applications that
reflect the distinct design requirements of
each facility type, enhancing the accuracy
of the overall estimate and helping to inform
future funding and phasing decisions.
Project specific cost estimates are included
in Appendix D. An example of the items
included in the cost estimates is shown in
figure 4.10.
Knowing detailed cost
estimates is essential for
securing local, state, and
federal funding for
transportation projects. Accurate
estimates not only demonstrate a
project's feasibility and readiness
but also strengthen applications
for competitive funding programs
by clearly outlining financial needs
and anticipated investments. By
providing a transparent, itemized
breakdown of projected costs—
including construction,
engineering, and contingencies—
Lincoln County can better align
proposed projects with available
funding sources and justify the
allocation of resources. This
financial clarity supports strategic
planning, enhances grant
competitiveness, and facilitates
more effective budgeting and
phasing over time.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Figure 4.10 An example of the cost
estimate table.
101
Five of the seven projects showed Benefit-
Cost Ratios (BCRs) greater than 1.0,
indicating that the long-term societal and
economic returns from those investments
outweigh the initial costs. Notable examples
include the Co Rd 118 Safety Improvement
(BCR of 2.74) and the 2nd Ave Extension
(BCR of 2.34), both of which offer strong
value. Projects like Pine Creek Rd and Shute
Creek Co Rd 340, with BCRs below 1.0, still
offer localized or strategic value even if the
benefit is not quite as high as the cost.
Beyond helping to understand how these
transportation improvements will benefit
the surrounding communities, the BCA
exercise also plays a critical role in enabling
Lincoln County to pursue competitive
federal transportation grants. Many grant
programs administered by USDOT require a
robust BCA as part of the application
process. By developing these benefit
estimates using nationally accepted
methods, Lincoln County is better
positioned to make data-driven investment
decisions and to secure external funding to
support infrastructure improvements that
enhance safety, economic opportunity, and
quality of life in the region.
As part of this Plan, a Benefit-Cost Analysis
(BCA) was conducted for seven of the
proposed transportation projects, using the
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
Highway Administration (USDOT FHWA)
2025 BCA guidance. This standardized
methodology allowed for a consistent and
defensible evaluation of potential
transportation investments. While several of
the benefit categories outlined in the FHWA
guidance, such as travel time savings,
emissions reductions, and other highway
externalities, did not apply to the rural
context of these projects, each of the
selected improvements demonstrated
quantifiable benefits in terms of safety,
public health, and economic agglomeration.
These benefits were especially relevant
given the nature of the projects.
The table below summarizes the one-time
construction costs alongside the calculated
long-term benefits for each project, which
were evaluated over a multi-year analysis
period (until 2040) in accordance with
FHWA practices.
Benefit-Cost Analysis
Project
ID Name Location Total Cost
Estimate
Calculated
Benefit
Benefit Cost
Ratio
5 Muddy String Co Rd
117
Co Rd 117 (from Piute Dr to
Stone Creek Ln)$6,040,000 $10,589,335.13 1.72
6 Co Rd 118 Safety
Improvement Co Rd 118 (US 89 to Co Rd 117)$2,250,000 $6,167,811.25 2.74
17 2nd Ave extension
(new road)
2nd Ave (Swift Creek
Reservoir to Co Rd 135)$1,050,000 $2,456,146.25 2.34
21 Co Rd 140 Co Rd 140 Johnson Ditch $700,000 $1,078,332.50 1.54
22 Co Rd 204 Co Rd 204 from SR 232 to
Pine Creek $4,690,000 $8,772,091.25 1.84
23 Pine Creek Rd Pine Creek crossing to parking
area $2,500,000 $1,194,718,75 0.48
25 Co Rd 340 Curve realignment near Shute
Creek Plant $4,960,000 $2,005,762.50 0.30
Access Type
Speed Range
(mph)
Residential /
Non
Residential
Commercial Subdivision /
Private Road County Road
Residential /
Non-
Residential
<=30 150 150 220 220
35 220 220 330 330
40-45 220 440 440 440
50-55 440 660 660 660
Commercial
<=30 150 220 220 330
35 220 220 330 440
40-45 440 440 440 660
50-55 660 660 660 660
Subdivision /
Private Road
<=30 220 220 330 330
35 330 330 660 660
40-45 440 440 880 880
50-55 660 660 880 880
County Road
<=30 220 330 330 440
35 330 440 660 660
40-45 440 660 880 880
50-55 440 660 880 1320
102
4.8 ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Access management is the practice of
coordinating the location, design, and
operation of driveways, intersections, and
median openings to preserve the safety and
efficiency of the transportation system. In
rural and developing counties like Lincoln
County, access management plays a crucial
role in balancing land access with mobility
and safety, especially along key corridors.
Table 4.8 Sample Access Management Guidelines
Access TypeNotes:
Minimum separation distances are listed in feet, measured per side.
When located on opposite sides of the road, access points should be directly aligned to form a four-legged
intersection with the main roadway; offset accesses should be avoided.
The number of access points should be minimized, and the spacing between them should be maximized to
enhance safety and traffic flow.
For access points on state highways, refer to the WYDOT Access Manual for specific guidelines.
While Lincoln County does not currently
have a formal access management policy,
discussions with County staff highlighted
interest in using access management
strategies to support long-term growth and
reduce crash risk. These strategies may
include applying design standards for
spacing between driveways and streets for
new developments. Table 4.8 presents
detailed access management guidelines
referenced by Lincoln County in the past.
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Functional Type Signal Spacing Street / Private Road
Spacing Driveway Spacing
Minor Arterial 5,280 1,000 1,000
Major Collector 2,640 660 500
Minor Collector 1,320 350 200
Local/ Driveway 1,320 300 150
103
The goal of these recommendations is not
to restrict development but to ensure that
new access points are planned in a way that
supports safety, reduces conflict points, and
protects roadway function over time.
Table 4.9: Draft Access Management Recommendations by Roadway Classification
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
As part of this planning effort, the project
team reviewed access management
standards from several sources and
discussed their applicability with Lincoln
County staff. Using this input, we developed
a refined set of draft access management
guidelines that Lincoln County may consider
using as a foundation for future policy or
case-by-case application. These guidelines
focus on minimum spacing between
driveways, subdivision streets or private
roads. The map of road functional
classification for Lincoln County can be
found in Chapter 2 section 2.6.
Figure 4.11 Driveway on a County Road.
104
CONCLUSION
Lincoln County Transportation Master Plan
Lincoln County is undergoing a period of
significant and rapid growth, with
expanding employment opportunities in the
southern part of the county and robust
residential development in the north. This
dynamic shift is bringing new residents,
increasing economic activity, and changing
travel patterns throughout the region. As a
result, the county's transportation network
is facing greater demands, and residents are
already beginning to experience the effects
of increased traffic on both local and county
roads.
Projections indicate that traffic volumes
will grow by an average of 37% across the
county by 2040, with some corridors
potentially seeing traffic double. Despite
these increases, the good news is that most
of the county’s existing roadway network
has sufficient capacity to accommodate this
growth. In general, the system is resilient
and well-positioned to manage future
demand without the need for extensive
roadway widening or major structural
changes.
This Transportation Master Plan provides a
forward-looking framework to ensure that
Lincoln County continues to thrive while
preserving its rural character and high
quality of life. It includes a range of
strategic project recommendations that
prioritize safety, connectivity, and long-
term efficiency. These projects are not just
about addressing today’s needs but are
proactive measures to ensure the county
can comfortably and sustainably handle
tomorrow’s growth.
In short, while growth is certain and
challenges will arise, the county is well-
prepared. With this plan in place, Lincoln
County is equipped to support future
development, maintain mobility, and
enhance livability for all residents. By
planning now, the county ensures that
transportation growth will be managed
thoughtfully.
Appendices
Appendix A
County RoutesMap & List
County Owned
Roads
Lincoln County, Wyoming Transportation Plan
Table 1.1
Percentage ofSegment Miles
48%
42%
10%
Based on the information acquired from the inventory the following general concerns were identified:
■ Significant portion of roadways are not paved
■ Paved roads do not have adequate striping
■ Some traffic control devices need updating
Of the 209 segments identified, Table 1.2 identifies the percentage breakdown of the road surface types that currently exist in Lincoln County.
Table 1.2
Percentage ofSegment Miles
43%
21%
34%
2%
Paved 2 73 64.32
Gravel 81 105.63
Primitive 6 4.9
Rural Major Collector 9 30.50
Road Surface SegmentType Number ofSegments Segment Miles
Paved 1 49 134.21
Segment Type Number ofSegments Segment Miles
Rural Local 163 147.21
Rural Minor Collector 37 131.35
Table 1.3
Mile Street Mile Surface
Type2 Width3
(feet)
EB WB NB SB
Old Alpine 0.00 US 89 1.25 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 21 Stop
Old Alpine 1.25 1.50 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 21Palisades Reservoir 0.00 US 89 0.75 North Rural Local 100 Gravel 24 StopMcNeel Power Plant 0.00 US 89 0.60 West Rural Local 100 Gravel 18 Stop
Stewart Trail 0.00 US 89 2.10 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 18 StopSanderson0.00 US 89 1.00 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 24 Yield StopSwimming Pool 0.00 US 89 1.30 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 21 Stop
Roberts-Wolfley 0.00 111 2.30 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Yield Stop
East Etna 0.00 112 3.50 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 19Creamery0.00 US 89 1.60 West Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 24 Stop StopEtna-Forest 0.00 US 89 1.00 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 19 Stop
Etna-Forest 1.00 110 1.40 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 19 YieldChokecherry0.00 US 89 1.50 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 21 StopState Line 0.00 SR 239 4.20 North Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 21 StopState Line 4.20 111 6.50 North Rural Major Collector 60 Gravel 21 Stop
Clark Lane 0.00 US 89 2.00 East Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 22 StopPrater Canyon 0.00 US 89 2.00 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 21 StopMuddy String 0.00 115 1.00 South Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 22
Muddy String 1.00 116 5.50 South Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 24 StopCedar Creek 0.00 US 89 2.00 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 28 Stop StopPerkins0.00 US 89 2.20 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 StopPerkins2.20 117 3.80 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Lost Creek 0.00 117 2.00 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 StopBedford North 0.00 120 2.20 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 24Thayne-Bedford 0.00 Thayne 0.70 East Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 30 Stop
Thayne-Bedford 0.70 117 3.00 East Rural Major Collector 60 Paved 1 25
Thayne-Bedford 3.00 4.00 South Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 25 Stop StopBedford-Turnerville 0.00 126 2.10 South Rural Minor Collector 70 Paved 1 25 StopBedford-Turnerville 2.10 5.40 South Rural Minor Collector 70 Paved 1 20
Robinson Lane 0.00 123 0.30 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 YieldThayne-Freedom 0.00 US 89 0.80 North Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 StopThayne-Freedom 0.80 5.60 North Rural Local 60 Paved 1 22
Strawberry Creek 0.00 US 89 3.10 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 23 Stop
Strawberry Creek 3.10 122 4.59 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 20Strawberry Creek 4.59 5.67 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 18Strawberry Landfill 0.00 126 0.10 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 26 Stop
Heiner-Suter Lane 0.00 123 1.00 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19 StopNarrows-Turnerville 0.00 US 89 1.32 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 20 StopGrover North 0.00 US 89 0.93 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19 StopGrover Narrows 0.00 SR 237 2.00 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 21 Stop Stop
Tom's Canyon 0.00 US 89 1.00 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 StopTom's Canyon 1.00 1.75 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 22Worton Lane 0.00 131 0.74 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 Yield
Worton Lane 0.00 0.74 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 StopStump Creek 0.00 197 2.18 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 20 Yield StopAuburn-Tygee 0.00 SR 238 2.27 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 StopAllred Lane 0.00 SR 238 2.00 North Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 Stop Stop
Kennington-Burton 0.00 Afton 1.20 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 StopKennington-Burton 1.20 3.00 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 22Swift Creek Lane 0.00 135 0.80 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 Stop
Auburn-Forest 0.00 238 0.72 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Stop
Bitter Creek 0.00 148 6.20 West/North Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 22 StopBitter Creek 6.20 SR 236 8.30 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 22 Stop StopCrow Creek 0.00 SR 238 3.50 South Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 22 Stop
Crow Creek 3.50 5.98 South Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 22Fairview North 0.00 140 0.80 West Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 23 Stop YieldFairview South 0.00 140 0.90 West Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 23 Stop Yield
Fairview Spring Creek 0.00 142 0.25 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 Stop Stop
Fairview Spring Creek 0.25 143 1.40 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 StopFairview Spring Creek 1.40 2.70 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 22Fairview Spring Creek 2.70 3.00 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 18
Papworth Lane 0.00 US 89 0.30 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 19 StopPapworth Lane 0.30 Airport 0.60 West Rural Local 61 Paved 2 20 YieldPapworth Lane 0.60 198 1.60 West Rural Local 60 Primitive 18 YieldDry Creek 0.00 140 2.40 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 21 Stop Stop
Dry Creek 2.40 SR 241 2.80 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 21 Stop StopDry Creek 2.80 US 89 3.49 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 StopLancaster Lane 0.00 SR 241 1.10 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Smoot-Afton 0.00 US 89 1.00 West Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 22 StopSmoot-Afton 1.00 140 2.50 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 24 Stop YieldReeves-Schwab 0.00 150 1.53 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 23 Stop YieldE. L. Clark 0.00 140 0.80 South Rural Local 50 Gravel 20 Yield
Smoot 0.00 US 89 1.10 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop YieldSmoot-Forest 0.00 US 89 0.90 East Rural Local 66 Paved 2 20 StopCottonwood Creek 0.00 US 89 1.00 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Pine Grove 0.00 US 89 0.55 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 Stop
McCoy 0.00 US 89 0.45 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 StopHappy Valley 0.00 US 89 0.50 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 22 Stop StopPeterson Court 0.00 US 89 0.30 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Stop
Birch Creek 0.00 110 0.75 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 YieldCottonwood Drive 0.00 151 0.30 North/West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Yield YieldAspen Hills 0.00 0.50 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 19 Stop
Westview Village Drive
(Westview Drive)0.00 US 89 0.42 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 21 Stop
Westview Village Drive (Circle Drive)0.00 West- view Dr 0.25 North/South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19 Yield (2)
Porter Lane 0.00 US 89 0.20 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 StopGood Neighbor Lane 0.00 US 89 0.50 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Tolman Lane 0.00 144 0.20 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 16
Bateman 0.00 123 0.50 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 YieldGrover Park 0.00 US 89 0.60 East Rural Local 66 Paved 2 22 StopRiverview Ranchettes (Ellis Lane)0.00 US 89 0.43 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 20 Stop
Road Number Road Name From To Direction Classification1 Existing ROW
Width1
(Feet)
Travelway Traffic ControlStreet
STAR VALLEY AREA ROADS100
100 End101End104End
106 End107110108End
109 108
110 End111114112110
112 End113End114111114End
115 117116117117116
117 122118117119117119End
120 121121122122117
122
122 126123123Forest
124 End125125SR 239
126 122
126
128 End129End
126 Forest126AEnd
127 End
130 US 89
131131 End132
132 US 89133134134Idaho135136
136136 End137Afton
139 Forest
140 SR 236140238141
141 Idaho142141143141
144 143
144144144 End
145 Airport145198145End146SR 241
146 US 89146Forest147End
148 140
154 End
155 End156SR 241
153 Forest
148 SR 241149US 89150End
151 148152End
157 End
159 End164151166
167 End
167 West- view Dr
168 End169End
170 End
171 End172Forest
173 Duffin Cir
Table 1.3
Mile Street Mile Surface
Type2 Width3
(feet)
EB WB NB SBRoad Number Road Name From To Direction Classification1 Existing ROW
Width1
(Feet)
Travelway Traffic ControlStreet
Riverview Ranchettes (Ellis Lane)0.43 Duffin Cir 0.56 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19
Riverview Ranchettes (Fidler
Lane)0.00 186 0.55 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19 Stop Yield
Riverview Ranchettes (Duffin Circle)0.00 Ellis Ln 0.50 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19
Riverview Ranchettes (Duffin Circle)0.50 1.60 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Yield
Bowles Lane 0.00 SR 241 0.50 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 Stop Stop
Bowles Lane 0.50 US 89 1.30 East/South Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 Stop
Gardner 0.00 US 89 0.65 East Rural Local 49.5 Gravel 18 StopWillow Creek Canyon 0.00 123 0.25 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 19 YieldWillow Creek Canyon 0.25 0.60 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 12
Corsi 0.00 110 0.25 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 YieldAlford Way 0.00 120 0.70 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 YieldFairview Townsite (First West)0.00 142 0.25 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Yield Stop
Fairview Townsite (First
South)0.00 140 0.12 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop Yield
Fairview Townsite (First South)0.12 1st W 0.25 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Yield Yield
Fairview Townsite (First South)0.25 144 0.37 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Yield
Rex Bateman Lane 0.00 110 0.30 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 YieldGrant Clark Court 0.00 114 0.10 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 19
Tee-Mont Drive 0.00 136 0.45 North/South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 18 Stop StopLazy Box J Ranch 0.00 173 0.10 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 19Astle0.00 2nd W 0.45 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 20
Lone Tree Lane 0.00 US 89 0.30 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 21 Stop
Lyle Clark 0.00 123 0.20 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 18 YieldSouth Grover 0.00 1st St 0.25 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 StopSouth Grover 0.25 US 89 0.50 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Grover Townsite (First Street)0.00 190 0.25 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop
Grover Townsite (Second Street)0.00 190 0.12 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield Yield
Grover Townsite (Second Street)0.12 Main St 0.25 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop Yield
Grover Townsite (Fourth
Street)0.00 190 0.12 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield Yield
Grover Townsite (Fourth Street)0.12 Main St 0.25 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield
Grover Townsite (Fifth Street)0.00 190 0.25 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield
Grover Townsite (Main Street)0.00 1st St 0.25 East Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop Yield
Grover Townsite (Main
Street)0.25 US 89 0.50 East Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield Stop
Smoot Townsite (E Street)0.00 148 0.25 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield Yield
Bedford Townsite (Strawberry St)0.00 126 0.50 North/West Rural Local 82.5 Paved 2 20 Yield Yield
Bedford Townsite (B Street)0.00 1st W St 0.12 East Rural Local 82.5 Paved 2 20 Stop
Bedford Townsite (B Street)0.12 122 0.25 East Rural Local 82.5 Paved 2 20 Stop
Bedford Townsite (1st West
Street)0.00 126 0.25 North Rural Local 82.5 Paved 2 20 Yield
Auburn Townsite (1st Street West)0.00 134 1.30 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 22 Yield Stop
Auburn Townsite (2nd Street West)0.00 134 0.57 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop
Auburn Townsite (3rd Street
West)0.00 134 0.43 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop
Auburn Townsite (Main
Street)0.00 US 89 0.16 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 22 Stop Yield
Auburn Townsite (Main Street)0.16 1st St W 0.45 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Yield
Auburn Townsite (1st Street North)0.00 SR 237 0.15 North Rural Local 99 Paved 2 20 Stop
Allred South 0.00 SR 238 2.00 South Rural Local 60 Paved 1 28 Stop Stop
Thompson 0.00 110 0.62 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 19 Yield
Griffey Lane 0.00 US 89 0.13 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 StopGriffey Lane 0.13 US 89 0.25 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 18 StopAuburn Cemetery 0.00 134 0.42 South/West Rural Local 60 Gravel 18 Yield
Meadow Lane 0.00 US 89 1.00 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Stop StopHialeah0.00 241 0.40 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 23 StopBellview0.00 148 0.50 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 21 YieldMills0.00 US 89 0.20 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 21
Starview 0.00 US 89 0.46 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 19 StopSaddle Drive 0.00 110 1.10 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 StopHoback Drive 0.00 119 0.60 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 22
Moose Manor Lane 0.00 SR 236 0.50 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 StopEasy Acres 0.00 135 0.31 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Stop
Raymond 0.00 US 89 0.20 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20 Stop
Pine Creek 0.00 SR 232 2.75 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 StopPine Creek 2.75 4.00 East Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 24Cokeville-Stopher 0.00 SR 332 0.75 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 Stop
Cokeville-Utah State Line 0.00 SR 231 5.00 South Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 1 28
173 186
173 Duffin Cir
173
173 End
174 US 89
174 End
175 End177177Forest
178 End179End
181 143
181 1st W
181 144
181 End
183 End184End
185 136186End187End
188 End
189 End190US 891905th St
191 SR 237
191 Main St
191 SR 237
191 Main St
196 Staw- berry St
196 B Street
196 122
196 122
191 172
191 172
191 US 89
191 5th St
195 406
197 132
197 1st St N
197 Main St
197 1st St W
197 3rd St W
197 2nd St W
198 SR 236
199 End
400 End400End402End
403 End405End406151407119
408 End414End415End
416 End417End
207
COKEVILLE AREA ROADS200 Idaho
204204 End206End
Table 1.3
MileStreetMileSurface
Type2Width3
(feet)
EBWBNBSBRoad NumberRoad NameFromToDirectionClassification1Existing ROW
Width1
(Feet)
TravelwayTraffic ControlStreet
Riverview Ranchettes (Ellis Lane)0.43Duffin Cir0.56EastRural Local60Paved 219
Riverview Ranchettes (Fidler
Lane)0.001860.55SouthRural Local60Paved 219StopYield
Riverview Ranchettes (Duffin Circle)0.00Ellis Ln0.50SouthRural Local60Paved 219
Riverview Ranchettes (Duffin Circle)0.501.60NorthRural Local60Gravel20Yield
Bowles Lane0.00SR 2410.50EastRural Local60Gravel22StopStop
Bowles Lane0.50US 891.30East/SouthRural Local60Gravel22Stop
Gardner0.00US 890.65EastRural Local49.5Gravel18StopWillow Creek Canyon0.001230.25EastRural Local60Paved 219YieldWillow Creek Canyon0.250.60EastRural Local60Gravel12
Corsi0.001100.25EastRural Local60Gravel20YieldAlford Way0.001200.70NorthRural Local60Paved 222YieldFairview Townsite (First West)0.001420.25SouthRural Local60Paved 220YieldStop
Fairview Townsite (First
South)0.001400.12WestRural Local60Paved 220StopYield
Fairview Townsite (First South)0.121st W0.25WestRural Local60Paved 220YieldYield
Fairview Townsite (First South)0.251440.37WestRural Local60Paved 220Yield
Rex Bateman Lane0.001100.30EastRural Local60Gravel20YieldGrant Clark Court0.001140.10EastRural Local60Gravel19
Tee-Mont Drive0.001360.45North/SouthRural Local60Paved 218StopStopLazy Box J Ranch0.001730.10EastRural Local60Gravel19Astle0.002nd W0.45WestRural Local60Gravel20
Lone Tree Lane0.00US 890.30EastRural Local60Gravel21Stop
Lyle Clark0.001230.20EastRural Local60Gravel18YieldSouth Grover0.001st St0.25EastRural Local60Paved 220StopSouth Grover0.25US 890.50EastRural Local60Paved 220Stop
Grover Townsite (First Street)0.001900.25NorthRural Local99Paved 220Stop
Grover Townsite (Second Street)0.001900.12NorthRural Local99Paved 220YieldYield
Grover Townsite (Second Street)0.12Main St0.25NorthRural Local99Paved 220StopYield
Grover Townsite (Fourth
Street)0.001900.12NorthRural Local99Paved 220YieldYield
Grover Townsite (Fourth Street)0.12Main St0.25NorthRural Local99Paved 220Yield
Grover Townsite (Fifth Street)0.001900.25NorthRural Local99Paved 220Yield
Grover Townsite (Main Street)0.001st St0.25EastRural Local99Paved 220StopYield
Grover Townsite (Main
Street)0.25US 890.50EastRural Local99Paved 220YieldStop
Smoot Townsite (E Street)0.001480.25NorthRural Local99Paved 220YieldYield
Bedford Townsite (Strawberry St)0.001260.50North/WestRural Local82.5Paved 220YieldYield
Bedford Townsite (B Street)0.001st W St0.12EastRural Local82.5Paved 220Stop
Bedford Townsite (B Street)0.121220.25EastRural Local82.5Paved 220Stop
Bedford Townsite (1st West
Street)0.001260.25NorthRural Local82.5Paved 220Yield
Auburn Townsite (1st Street West)0.001341.30NorthRural Local99Paved 222YieldStop
Auburn Townsite (2nd Street West)0.001340.57NorthRural Local99Paved 220Stop
Auburn Townsite (3rd Street
West)0.001340.43NorthRural Local99Paved 220Stop
Auburn Townsite (Main
Street)0.00US 890.16NorthRural Local99Paved 222StopYield
Auburn Townsite (Main Street)0.161st St W0.45NorthRural Local99Paved 220Yield
Auburn Townsite (1st Street North)0.00SR 2370.15NorthRural Local99Paved 220Stop
Allred South0.00SR 2382.00SouthRural Local60Paved 128StopStop
Thompson0.001100.62EastRural Local60Gravel19Yield
Griffey Lane0.00US 890.13WestRural Local60Gravel22StopGriffey Lane0.13US 890.25WestRural Local60Gravel18StopAuburn Cemetery0.001340.42South/WestRural Local60Gravel18Yield
Meadow Lane0.00US 891.00WestRural Local60Gravel20StopStopHialeah0.002410.40WestRural Local60Gravel23StopBellview0.001480.50NorthRural Local60Paved 221YieldMills0.00US 890.20NorthRural Local60Gravel21
Starview0.00US 890.46WestRural Local60Gravel19StopSaddle Drive0.001101.10WestRural Local60Gravel24StopHoback Drive0.001190.60NorthRural Local60Gravel22
Moose Manor Lane0.00SR 2360.50SouthRural Local60Gravel22StopEasy Acres0.001350.31WestRural Local60Gravel20Stop
Raymond0.00US 890.20WestRural Local60Paved 220Stop
Pine Creek0.00SR 2322.75EastRural Local60Paved 124StopPine Creek2.754.00EastRural Minor Collector60Gravel24Cokeville-Stopher0.00SR 3320.75EastRural Local60Gravel22Stop
Cokeville-Utah State Line0.00SR 2315.00SouthRural Minor Collector60Paved 128
173186
173Duffin Cir
173
173End
174US 89
174End
175End177177Forest
178End179End
181143
1811st W
181144
181End
183End184End
185136186End187End
188End
189End190US 891905th St
191SR 237
191Main St
191SR 237
191Main St
196Staw- berry St
196B Street
196122
196122
191172
191172
191US 89
1915th St
195406
197132
1971st St N
197Main St
1971st St W
1973rd St W
1972nd St W
198SR 236
199End
400End400End402End
403End405End406151407119
408End414End415End
416End417End
207
COKEVILLE AREA ROADS200Idaho
204204End206End
Table 1.3
Mile Street Mile Surface
Type2 Width3
(feet)
EB WB NB SBRoad Number Road Name From To Direction Classification1 Existing ROW
Width1
(Feet)
Travelway Traffic ControlStreet
Cokeville-Utah State Line 5.00 17.00 South Rural Minor Collector 100 Paved 1 25
Rock Creek 0.00 US 30 1.00 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 25 Stop
Rock Creek 1.00 4.40 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 21Rock Creek 4.40 5.15 North Rural Local 60 Primitive 12Forgren Slough 0.00 0.20 Rural Local 60 Gravel 20
Etcheverry 0.00 US 89 0.25 West Rural Local 66 Gravel 20 StopJohns Lane 0.00 US 89 0.36 West Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 StopTaylor Subdivision (Valley
View Dr)0.00 207 0.40 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 Stop
Taylor Subdivision (Taylor
Ln)0.00 207 0.40 West Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 Stop
Dipper Creek 0.00 US 89 0.81 East Rural Local 60 Primitive 12Crawford Mountains 0.00 US 89 1.00 South Rural Local 100 Gravel 22 Stop
Kemmerer Airport 0.00 SR 233 0.20 West Rural Local 200 Paved 1 26 Stop
Kemmerer Airport 0.20 1.40 West Rural Local 200 Paved 1 22Fossil Butte 0.00 US 30 4.00 East Rural Local 80 Paved 1 24 StopAlleman0.00 304 1.43 West Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24
Elkol (east/west)0.00 US 189 0.10 East Rural Minor Collector 100 Paved 1 28 Stop StopElkol (north/south)0.00 302 0.80 South Rural Minor Collector 200 Paved 1 24 StopElkol (north/south)0.80 304 2.82 South Rural Minor Collector 200 Paved 1 24 Stop
Ham's Fork 0.00 SR 233 14.5 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 22
Sublet-Pomeroy Basin 0.00 US 189 5.00 North Rural Minor Collector 200 Paved 1 28 StopSublet-Pomeroy Basin 5.00 9.40 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Paved 2 24Sublet-Pomeroy Basin 9.40 23.50 North Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 28
Graham's Lane 0.00 US 30 2.00 West Rural Local 100 Paved 2 18 StopLincoln-Sweetwater 0.00 SR 372 0.85 East Rural Minor Collector 100 Gravel 24 StopFontenelle Dam 0.00 US 189 3.97 East Rural Minor Collector 100 Gravel 24 StopFontenelle Creek 0.00 US 189 11.62 West Rural Minor Collector 100 Paved 1 22 Stop
LaBarge Creek 0.00 US 189 11.20 West Rural Minor Collector 100 Paved 1 22 StopLaBarge Creek 11.20 13.00 West Rural Minor Collector 100 Gravel 19Fontenelle North 0.00 SR 372 0.50 North Rural Minor Collector 100 Paved 1 20 Stop
Fontenelle North 0.50 3.27 North Rural Minor Collector 100 Gravel 24Sublette Cutoff 0.00 US 189 1.15 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 25 StopAspen Springs 0.00 US 189 2.66 East Rural Local 100 Paved 2 22 StopLaBarge Airport 0.00 US 189 0.50 West Rural Minor Collector 60 Gravel 22 Stop
Conroy 0.00 US 30 0.19 South Rural Local 66 Gravel 22 StopCalhoun0.00 US 30 1.92 East Rural Local 60 Paved 1 24 StopSkull Point 0.00 US 189 West Rural Local 100 Paved 1 25 Stop
Skull Point 2.80 West Rural Local 200 Paved 1 25
Waterfall 0.00 US 30 0.33 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 StopFox Farm 0.00 SR 233 0.88 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 22 Stop StopTwin Creek - South Fork 0.00 US 30 0.60 South Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22 Stop
Twin Creek - South Fork 0.60 342 7.10 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 StopOakley Subdivision 0.00 US 30 0.42 North Rural Local 60 Paved 2 18 StopFrontier Townsite 0.00 1.77 Rural Local 60 Gravel 16-22
Clear Creek 0.00 US 30 1.00 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 Stop
Clear Creek 1.00 3.30 South Rural Local 60 Gravel 22Clear Creek 3.30 4.00 South Rural Local 60 Primitive 12Fontenelle-Forest 0.00 306 1.90 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 20
Niobe 0.00 333 0.11 North Rural Local 60 Primitive 16Gomer0.00 SR 233 2.90 East Rural Local 60 Gravel 24 YieldShute Creek 0.00 240 9.80 East Rural Major Collector 100 Paved 1 26 Stop StopShute Creek 9.80 13.50 East Rural Major Collector 100 Paved 1 26
Twin Creek North 0.00 US 30 0.66 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 20Twin Creek South 0.00 328 2.44 East Rural Local 60 Paved 2 22Viola Cemetery 0.00 315 0.70 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 20
Little Coal Creek Access 0.00 306 1.53 East Rural Local 30 Primitive 12Kemmerer Landfill 0.00 US 30 0.65 North Rural Local 60 Paved 1 20 StopViola Subdivision 0.00 315 1.64 North Rural Local 60 Gravel 20 Stop
NOTES:
1 See 2004 road inventory performed by Lincoln County
B. SUPPLEMENTAL SIGN INVENTORY
Lincoln County, Wyoming Transportation Plan
209
209
207 Utah
209 End211
216 Idaho217End
218 End
218 End
219 End220UtahKEMMERER AREA ROADS234
234 End300End302End
304 304304304304End
305 Forest
306306306 334/344
310 End311Sweetwater313316314End
315315 Forest316
316 313318Sublette319End
325 End
326 End
321 End
322 End323End325
327 US 189328342
328 End329End330
331
331331 End334Forest
336 Sublette338306340340Sublette
341 328342End
This sign inventory includes all roadway signage in Lincoln County that was not originally included in the Speed Zoning Signing Plans. Table 1.4 outlines all the additional regulatory and warning signage located in Lincoln County. This inventory includes the road number, road name, station orientation, and sign type. As noted in Table 1.4, all signage is listed according to “increasing station” or “decreasing station”.
3 Paved - Width was measured from the edge of pavement (striping was neglected on the few county roads that have striping; Shute Creek, Fossil Butte, and ) Gravel - Width was measured from the hinge point (or break in slope) at the edge of the road
2 "Paved 1" is hot plant type pavement, "Paved 2" is a lesser quality paved surface constructed by chip sealing a gravel road
343 End
344 End345End346End
In addition to the road inventory a Lincoln County regulatory and warning sign inventory was conducted for all roadways not included as a part of the Lincoln County Roads Speed Zoning Signing Plans, assembled in July of 2002.
Appendix B
CountyResolutions
' ..I, .J RESOLUTION NO. C/7-,S RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, WYOMING, REGARDING ROADS WHICH ARE REQUESTED TO BE DEDICATED AS ROADS WITHIN THE COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the County of Lincoln, State of Wyoming, adopts the following standards regarding roads which are requested to be dedicated as County roads within the County road system, to wit: Section l. Procedure for Acceptance: Persons desiring roads to be dedicated to the public and to be accepted by the county as a county road shall conform with the procedures set forth in the Wyoming Statutes, §24-3-101 to §24-3-127 (1993 as amended), regarding the establishment of county roads. Additionally the following procedures shall be followed: (A)Submit a County road petition form for review by CountyCommissioners after it has been approved by the County Engineer and Surveyor. (B)Submit signed perpetual easements to Lincoln County from ownersof all properties crossed by the proposed road. (C)Submit an official map, prepared by Wyoming licensed surveyor atthe expense of the proponent. (D)Follow statutory procedures for public notice, public hearings, andpassage of a resolution by County Commissioners. Section 2. Road Specifications: (A)Lincoln County shall not bear the responsibility or expense ofbringing proposed county roads into compliance with county standards. It shall be the responsibility of the persons petitioning or requesting the establishment of a road as a county road to have the road constructed to Lincoln County standards. Prior to acceptance, the County Surveyor shall certify that said road meets County standards.
Appendix C
CountyConnectivity
Connectivity
As development occurs, it is important that subdivisions and neighborhoods provide
connectivity to adjacent developments.
External connectivity
Residential external connectivity standards must be considered. In addition to the internal
street connectivity standards, external connectivity shall be maintained. These
standards are intended to create a connected transportation system between
neighborhoods and commercial areas, with the goal of promoting additional connections
and shorter block lengths, improving emergency response times, providing better routes to
schools and parks, preventing isolated developments, and reducing impacts of
development on arterial and collector roads by providing alternate routes.
Cul-de-Sacs
Cul-de-sacs and loop roads are discouraged as a design element in subdivisions and are
best used where topographic conditions, existing streets, clustering or property ownership
make them necessary. In no case shall a cul-de-sac street have a length that exceeds 1000
feet measured to the center of the circle or serve more than 15 homes or generate greater
than 150 average daily vehicle trips, unless granted by the commission. Permanent cul-de-
sacs shall have a minimum right-of-way radius of 70 feet. All cul-de-sacs shall provide
pedestrian connectivity to open spaces, public facilities, sidewalks or trails. No cul-de-
sacs will be permitted when the topography has a downward slope without storm water
protection plans by a Wyoming licensed engineer.
Temporary Turnarounds
Dead-end streets (that will connect eventually) may be permitted temporarily between
phases of development, where plans for future streets and street connections will
eventually eliminate the dead-end street. Temporary turnarounds shall have a minimum
turning radius of 70 feet. The location of temporary turnarounds shall be governed by cul-
de-sac service requirements. Turnarounds shall include measures to protect against
temporary storm water erosion by a Wyoming licensed engineer.
Intersection Separation
Street intersections shall be separated by at least 660 feet, centerline to centerline, from
any other intersection. Local streets at T-intersections shall be separated by at least 300
feet, centerline to centerline, from any other intersection. The county engineer may require
greater separation depending upon the classifications of the intersecting streets.
Appendix D
Cost Estimates
Project Location Total Cost Project Type Funding Source
1 Caribou Loop Trail (North) ORV $1,060,000 OHV Trail Lincoln County
2 Co Rd 110 North Extension $640,000 New Road Lincoln County3Etna Rd improvement Widening $2,560,000 Widening Lincoln County
4 Etna S Rd extention to Co Rd 118 $3,520,000 New Road Lincoln County5Muddy String Co Rd 117 Safety improvement, add shoulder and striping $6,870,000 Widening Lincoln County
6 Co Rd 118 Safety improvement $2,510,000 Widening Lincoln County
7 Oxbow Drive Rd Extention $260,000 New Road Lincoln County
8 Co Rd 419 $1,880,000 Widening Lincoln County
9 Realignment of Co Rd 126 and US 89 $1,390,000 New Road Lincoln County
10 Willow Creek Lane Extension $2,350,000 New Road Lincoln County
11 Co Rd 177/123 ORV $310,000 OHV Trail Lincoln County
12 Grover to Turnerville $6,940,000 Widening Lincoln County
13 Pole Line Rd connection (new road)$9,500,000 New Road Lincoln County
14 Co Rd 136 extention (new road)$3,650,000 New Road Lincoln County
15 1st Ave extention (new Road)$1,120,000 New Road Lincoln County
16 Lincoln Co Fair (new Road)$1,670,000 New Road Lincoln County
17 2nd Ave extention (new road)$1,120,000 New Road Lincoln County
18 Caribou Loop Trail (South)$3,920,000 OHV Trail Lincoln County
19 Co Rd 198 extention (new road)$1,700,000 New Road Lincoln County
20 Dry Creek Rd ORV $320,000 OHV Trail Lincoln County
21 Realign curve on Co Rd 140 $750,000 New Road Lincoln County
22 Capacity improvement Co Rd 204 $5,240,000 Widening Lincoln County
23 Pine Creek Rd realignment $3,910,000 Widening $23
24 Co Rd 207 Capacity improvement $9,160,000 Widening Lincoln County
25 Co Rd 340 realignment $7,390,000 New Road Lincoln CountyPoint Projects
101 Intersection Improvement # 1 $4,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
102 Intersection Improvement # 2 $50,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
103 Parking Improvement # 3 $60,000 Gravel Parking Lot Lincoln County
104 Intersection Improvement # 4 $7,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
105 Intersection Improvement # 5 $18,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
106 Safety Improvement # 6 $4,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
107 Intersection Improvement # 7 $5,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
108 Safety Improvement # 8 $7,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
109 Intersection Improvement # 9 $21,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
110 Parking Improvement # 10 $28,000 Gravel Parking Lot Lincoln County
111 Intersection Improvement # 11 $4,000 Intersection Improvement Lincoln County
AT Projects
201 201. Etna Nordic Foothills $4,700,000 Paved Trail Lincoln County
202 202. Star Valley Ranch State Land Loop Trail $4,000,000 Paved Trail Lincoln County
203 203. Muddy String Bikeway $100,000 Bike Lane Lincoln County
204 204. Bedford to Turnerville Bikeway $7,310,000 Widening Lincoln County
205 205. Turnerville to Grover $110,000 Bike Lane Lincoln County
206 206. Pole Line Rd Bikeway $60,000 Bike Lane Lincoln County
207 207. Auburn Loop $8,460,000 Widening Lincoln County
208 208. Afton School Bikeway Loop Trail $3,240,000 Widening Lincoln County
209 209. Co Rd 135 Bikeway $5,890,000 Widening Lincoln County
210 210. Co Rd 204 Bikeway $80,000 Bike Lane Lincoln County
211 211. Cokeville Bikeway $70,000 Bike Lane Lincoln County
Total $113,968,000
Project Summary
Item Unit Unit Cost 2024 Bid Price
Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 $17,670
Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 $0.65
Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 $8.74
Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 $3.60
Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 $17.17
Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 $46.91
Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 $60.01
HMA Ton $110.00 $82.56
Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 $1.28
Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 $0.22
Fog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 $0.22
Bike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 $0.22
Stop Bar L.F.$3.00 $3.00
Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 $841
Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 $45.15
New Fencing L.F.$4.20 $4.18
Drainage % of Cost 15%
Box Culvert L.F.$3,500 $3,481
Bridge S.F.$250 $0
Items not included in estimate*
Mobilization
Preconstruction Engineering*
Construction Engineering*
UDOT Cost Estimator Tool
16%
Lincoln County Wyoming
Transportation Improvement Projects
Unit Costs
30%
10%
16%
1ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 29185 8" Trail on both sidesClearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 8 $142,308Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 12Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 12Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 4,320 $77,760Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 8Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 6,490 $395,890 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0 5 each way, 12 feet wideBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$615,958 030%$184,78710%$61,59616%$98,55316%$98,553$1,060,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =0.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 1. Caribou Loop Trail (North) ORV Back to Project ListOHV Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadSubtotalPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)1Lincoln CountyOHV Trail - GravelItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
2ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 2283.398Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 2 $35,400Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 4,567 $3,197 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 2,640 $47,520Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 1,470 $69,090 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 730 $44,530 0HMATon$110.00 845 $92,934 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 6,600 $8,580Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 2,280 $1,140 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 2,280 $1,140 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 4,567 $19,181 0Drainage% of Cost 15%322,712 $48,407 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$371,118 030%$111,33510%$37,11216%$59,37916%$59,379 3330000$640,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0 2Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT <400 2' Shoulder)Overall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineLincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 2. Co Rd 110 North Extension Back to Project ListNew Road
3ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 13226Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 12 $204,258Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 26,453 $18,517 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 7,050 $126,900Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 3,920 $184,240 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,960 $119,560 18HMATon$110.00 4,241 $466,535 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 38,210 $49,673Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 13,230 $6,615 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 13,230 $6,615 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 26,453 $111,101 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,294,013 $194,102 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0 5 each way, 12 feet wideBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,488,115 030%$446,43510%$148,81216%$238,09816%$238,098$2,560,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 3. Etna Rd improvement Widening Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadSubtotalPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs Bridge (S.F)3Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
4ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 10561.58Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 9 $163,194Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 21,123 $14,786 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 12,200 $219,600Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 6,780 $318,660 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,390 $206,790 0HMATon$110.00 3,908 $429,856 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 30,510 $39,663Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,560 $5,280 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,560 $5,280 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 50 $150Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 4Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 21,123 $88,717 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,776,977 $266,547 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 1,140 $285,000 Width$2,043,524 114030%$613,05710%$204,35216%$326,96416%$326,964 3330000$3,520,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 4. Etna S Rd extention to Co Rd 118 Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)4Lincoln CountyLocal - PavedItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
5ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 26229.35Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 6 $106,731Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 52,459 $36,721 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 11,660 $102,608 50Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 69,950 $251,820 10Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 16,320 $293,760Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 7,770 $365,190 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,890 $237,290 28HMATon$110.00 15,528 $1,708,055 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 104,920 $136,396Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 26,230 $13,115 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 52,459 $220,327 0Drainage% of Cost 15%3,472,013 $520,802 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$3,992,815 030%$1,197,84410%$399,28116%$638,85016%$638,850$6,870,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0 Back to SummaryBack to Project ListCostsPreconstruction EngineeringLincoln County WyomingTransportation Master Plan Widening5. Muddy String Co Rd 117 Safety improvement, add shoulder and striping Pavement Width NeededExisting Pavement/GravelLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthCenter LineFog LineSubtotalItems not included in estimateMobilization Stop BarsAvg. Stop Bar LengthBike Lane LineTraffic Control SignsPavement Markings (L.F.)Replace Fence for New/Widen RoadCulvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)Collector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)Construction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 5Lincoln CountyOverall Assumptions:
6ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 10537.19Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 3 $60,003Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 21,074 $14,752 50Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 4,690 $41,272 36Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 18,740 $67,464 14Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 7,100 $127,800Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 3,640 $171,080 30Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,820 $111,020 20HMATon$110.00 4,808 $528,932 10Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 35,120 $45,656Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,540 $5,270 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,540 $5,270 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 30 $90Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 21,074 $88,512 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,267,121 $190,068 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,457,189 030%$437,15710%$145,71916%$233,15016%$233,150$2,510,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.3'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =10.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 6. Co Rd 118 Safety improvement Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)6Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT 400-2000 4' Shoulder)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
7ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 901.1544Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 1 $13,983Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 1,802 $1,262 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 1,040 $18,720Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 580 $27,260 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 290 $17,690 0HMATon$110.00 333 $36,677 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 2,600 $3,380Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 900 $450 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 900 $450 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 30 $90Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 1,802 $7,570 0Drainage% of Cost 15%127,531 $19,130 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$146,661 030%$43,99810%$14,66616%$23,46616%$23,466$260,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 7. Oxbow Drive Rd Extention Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)7Lincoln CountyLocal - PavedItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
8ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 8150.075Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 7 $125,847Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 16,300 $11,410 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 3,630 $31,944 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 12,680 $45,648 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 4,710 $84,780Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 2,410 $113,270 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,210 $73,810 18HMATon$110.00 3,217 $353,822 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 23,540 $30,602Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 8,150 $4,075 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 8,150 $4,075 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 30 $90Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 10 $460 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 16,300 $68,461 0Drainage% of Cost 15%948,294 $142,244 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 1BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,090,538 030%$327,16110%$109,05416%$174,48616%$174,486 3330000$1,880,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.3'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =10.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0 8Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT 400-2000 4' Shoulder)Overall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineLincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 8. Co Rd 419 Back to Project ListWidening
9ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 3715.773Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 4 $75,579Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 7,432 $5,202 50Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 50Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 5,370 $96,660Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 2,750 $129,250 30Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,380 $84,180 0HMATon$110.00 2,337 $257,094 30Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 12,390 $16,107Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 3,720 $1,860 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 3,720 $1,860 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 20 $60Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 7,432 $31,212 0Drainage% of Cost 15%699,065 $104,860 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$803,925 030%$241,17710%$80,39216%$128,62816%$128,628$1,390,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.3'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =10.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 9. Realignment of Co Rd 126 and US 89 Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)9Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT 400-2000 4' Shoulder)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
10ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 12349.07Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 11 $190,806Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 24,698 $17,289 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 11,890 $214,020Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 7,930 $372,710 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,960 $241,560 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 35,680 $46,384Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 24,698 $103,732 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,186,501 $177,975 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,364,476 030%$409,34310%$136,44816%$218,31616%$218,316$2,350,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.0'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =0.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 10. Willow Creek Lane Extension Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)10Lincoln CountyLocal - GravelItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
11ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 6171.937Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 2 $40,179Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 16Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 16Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 1,370 $24,660Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 12Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,830 $111,630 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 12New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$176,469 030%$52,94110%$17,64716%$28,23516%$28,235$310,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =0.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 11. Co Rd 177/123 ORV Back to Project ListOHV Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)11Lincoln CountyOHV Trail - GravelItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
12ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 21820Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 15 $266,031Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 43,641 $30,548 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 30Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 30Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 22,630 $407,340Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 10,780 $506,660 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 5,390 $328,790 20HMATon$110.00 15,071 $1,657,760 16Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 87,280 $113,464Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 21,820 $10,910 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 43,641 $183,290 0Drainage% of Cost 15%3,504,793 $525,719 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$4,030,512 030%$1,209,15410%$403,05116%$644,88216%$644,882$6,940,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 12. Grover to Turnerville Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)12Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
13ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 15775Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 22 $384,621Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 31,551 $22,086 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 60Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 29,450 $530,100Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 14,020 $658,940 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 7,010 $427,610 0HMATon$110.00 15,565 $1,712,157 36Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 63,100 $82,030Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 15,780 $7,890 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 31,551 $132,513 0Drainage% of Cost 15%4,797,947 $719,692 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 240 $840,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 234 Width 9 culverts x 26'$5,517,639 030%$1,655,29210%$551,76416%$882,82216%$882,822$9,500,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 13. Pole Line Rd connection (new road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)13Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
14ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 6336Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 6 $97,881Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 12,672 $8,870 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 7,320 $131,760Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 4,070 $191,290 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 2,030 $123,830 0HMATon$110.00 2,344 $257,875 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 18,300 $23,790Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 6,340 $3,170 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 6,340 $3,170 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 12,672 $53,222 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,844,859 $276,729 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 3,380 $845,000 26 Width 1$2,121,588 338030%$636,47610%$212,15916%$339,45416%$339,454$3,650,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 14. Co Rd 136 extention (new road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Subtotal Culvert Width (L.F)Bridge (S.F)14Lincoln CountyLocal - PavedItems not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs
15ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 3990Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 3 $61,773Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 7,980 $5,586 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 4,610 $82,980Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 2,560 $120,320 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,280 $78,080 0HMATon$110.00 1,476 $162,386 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 11,530 $14,989Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 3,990 $1,995 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 3,990 $1,995 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 7,980 $33,515 0Drainage% of Cost 15%563,619 $84,543 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$648,161 030%$194,44810%$64,81616%$103,70616%$103,706$1,120,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 15. 1st Ave extention (new Road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 15Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
16ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 1548Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 1 $24,072Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 3,096 $2,167 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 1,790 $32,220Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 990 $46,530 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 500 $30,500 0HMATon$110.00 573 $62,999 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 4,470 $5,811Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 1,550 $775 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 1,550 $775 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 3,096 $13,002 0Drainage% of Cost 15%843,851 $126,578 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 2,080 $520,000 26 Width$970,429 208030%$291,12910%$97,04316%$155,26916%$155,269$1,670,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 16. Lincoln Co Fair (new Road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 16Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
17ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 4003Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 4 $61,950Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 8,007 $5,605 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 4,630 $83,340Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 2,570 $120,790 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,290 $78,690 0HMATon$110.00 1,481 $162,938 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 11,570 $15,041Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 4,000 $2,000 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 4,000 $2,000 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 8,007 $33,629 0Drainage% of Cost 15%565,983 $84,897 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$650,880 030%$195,26410%$65,08816%$104,14116%$104,141$1,120,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 17. 2nd Ave extention (new road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 17Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
18ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 79664Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 29 $518,079Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 16Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 16Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 17,700 $318,600Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 12 2-way trailCrushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 23,600 $1,439,600 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$2,276,279 030%$682,88410%$227,62816%$364,20516%$364,205$3,920,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =0.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 18. Caribou Loop Trail (South)Back to Project ListOHV Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 18Lincoln CountyOHV Trail - Gravel
19ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 5315Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 5 $82,128Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 10,631 $7,442 38Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 38Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 6,140 $110,520Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 3,410 $160,270 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,710 $104,310 0HMATon$110.00 1,967 $216,339 26Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 15,360 $19,968Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 5,320 $2,660 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 5,320 $2,660 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 10,631 $44,650 0Drainage% of Cost 15%855,946 $128,392 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 26 Width$984,338 030%$295,30210%$98,43416%$157,49416%$157,494$1,700,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 19. Co Rd 198 extention (new road)Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 19Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
20ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 8792Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 2 $43,011Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 12Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 12Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 1,300 $23,400Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 8Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,950 $118,950 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$185,361 030%$55,60810%$18,53616%$29,65816%$29,658$320,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =0.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 20. Dry Creek Rd ORV Back to Project ListOHV Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 20Lincoln CountyOHV Trail - Gravel
21ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 1513Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 2 $30,798Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 50Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 50Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 2,190 $39,420Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 1,120 $52,640 30Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 560 $34,160 0HMATon$110.00 952 $104,694 30Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 5,040 $6,552Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 1,510 $755 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 1,510 $755 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%374,774 $56,216 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 26 Width$430,990 030%$129,29710%$43,09916%$68,95816%$68,958$750,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.3'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =10.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 21. Realign curve on Co Rd 140 Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 21Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT 400-2000 4' Shoulder)
22ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 14831Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 10 $180,894Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 29,662 $20,763 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 6,600 $58,080 30Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 26,370 $94,932 30Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 15,380 $276,840Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 7,320 $344,040 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,660 $223,260 20HMATon$110.00 10,243 $1,126,744 16Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 59,320 $77,116Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 14,830 $7,415 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 14,830 $7,415 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 29,662 $124,579 0Drainage% of Cost 15%2,647,078 $397,062 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 26 Width$3,044,140 030%$913,24210%$304,41416%$487,06216%$487,062$5,240,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 22. Capacity improvement Co Rd 204 Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 22Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
23ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 8167Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 7 $119,475Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 16,334 $11,434 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 3,630 $31,944 24Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 14,520 $52,272 36Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 8,470 $152,460Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 6,050 $284,350 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,020 $184,220 20HMATon$110.00 5,641 $620,466 16Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 32,670 $42,471Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 8,170 $4,085 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesUtility relocation Each $400,000.00 1 $400,000Stop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 16,334 $68,602 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,971,778 $295,767 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$2,267,545 030%$680,26310%$226,75416%$362,80716%$362,807$3,910,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =12'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 23. Pine Creek Rd realignment Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 23Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
24ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 29281Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 24 $428,340Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 58,563 $40,994 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 13,020 $114,576 24Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 65,070 $234,252 36Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 24,290 $437,220Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 11,570 $543,790 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 5,780 $352,580 24HMATon$110.00 18,779 $2,065,706 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 117,130 $152,269Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 29,280 $14,640 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 58,563 $245,964 0Drainage% of Cost 15%4,630,331 $694,550 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$5,324,881 0 Does not include bridge improvements30%$1,597,46410%$532,48816%$851,98116%$851,981$9,160,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 24. Co Rd 207 Capacity improvement Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 24Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
25ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 19308Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 22 $392,409Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 38,615 $27,031 50Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 50Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 27,890 $502,020Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 14,300 $672,100 30Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 7,150 $436,150 0HMATon$110.00 12,145 $1,335,902 30Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 64,360 $83,668Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 19,310 $9,655 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 19,310 $9,655 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 38,615 $162,185 0Drainage% of Cost 15%3,735,775 $560,366 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 26 Width$4,296,141 0 Does not include bridge improvements30%$1,288,84210%$429,61416%$687,38316%$687,383$7,390,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.3'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =10.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 25. Co Rd 340 realignment Back to Project ListNew Road Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 25Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT 400-2000 4' Shoulder)
101ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0 Manual EntryClearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 26Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 26Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 26Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 26HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 200 $100 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 40 $120Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 2 $1,700 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 18New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 2Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,920 030%$57610%$19216%$30716%$307$4,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 101. Intersection Improvement # 1 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 101Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
102ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 180 Manual EntryClearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 30Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 30Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 270 $4,860Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 150 $7,050 30Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 80 $4,880 0HMATon$110.00 67 $7,326 30Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 600 $780Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 150 $75 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 50 $150Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 4 $3,400 3Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 4Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$28,521 030%$8,55610%$2,85216%$4,56316%$4,563$50,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 102. Intersection Improvement # 2 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 102Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
103ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 136Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.17 $3,009Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 54Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 54Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 340 $6,120Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 136Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 340 $20,740 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 136Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$29,869 030%$8,96110%$2,98716%$4,77916%$4,779$60,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 103. Parking Improvement # 3 Back to Project ListGravel Parking Lot Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 103Lincoln CountyGravel Parking Lot
104ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 150 $75 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 30 $90Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 4 $3,400 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 22New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 4Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$3,565 030%$1,07010%$35716%$57016%$570$7,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 104. Intersection Improvement # 4 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 104Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
105ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 100Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 50 $440 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 70 $1,260Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 40 $1,880 10Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 20 $1,220 0HMATon$110.00 15 $1,628 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 110 $143Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 200 $100 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 40 $120Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 4 $3,400 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 20New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 4Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$10,191 030%$3,05710%$1,01916%$1,63116%$1,631$18,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 105. Intersection Improvement # 5 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 105Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
106ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 150 $75 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 20 $60Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 1 $850 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 20 $920 15New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 1Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 16BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,905 030%$57210%$19116%$30516%$305$4,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 106. Safety Improvement # 6 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 106Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
107ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 100 $50 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 20 $60Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 3 $2,550 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 15New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 3Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$2,660 030%$79810%$26616%$42616%$426$5,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 107. Intersection Improvement # 7 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 107Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
108ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 100 $50 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 20 $60Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 4 $3,400 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 15New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 4Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$3,510 030%$1,05310%$35116%$56216%$562$7,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 108. Safety Improvement # 8 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 108Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
109ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 44 1936 sqftClearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.05 $885Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 44Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 20 $176 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 44Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 90 $1,620Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 50 $2,350 44Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 30 $1,830 0HMATon$110.00 24 $2,627 44Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 220 $286Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 200 $100 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 40 $120Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 2 $1,700 2Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 18New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 2Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$11,694 030%$3,50810%$1,16916%$1,87116%$1,871$21,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 109. Intersection Improvement # 9 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 109Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
110ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 100Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.04 $708Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 15Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 15Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 190 $3,420Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 100Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 190 $11,590 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 100Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$15,718 030%$4,71510%$1,57216%$2,51516%$2,515$28,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =0 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =0'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.5'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 110. Parking Improvement # 10 Back to Project ListGravel Parking Lot Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 110Lincoln CountyGravel Parking Lot
111ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 0Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 150 $75 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 20 $60Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 1 $850 1Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 20 $920 20New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 1Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 16BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0 Width$1,905 030%$57210%$19116%$30516%$305$4,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =2'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.2'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 111. Intersection Improvement # 11 Back to Project ListIntersection Improvement Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 111Lincoln CountyLocal - Paved
201ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 14028Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 8 $136,821Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 24Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 24Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 6,650 $119,700Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 12Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 4,160 $253,760 0HMATon$110.00 3,114 $342,557 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 14,030 $7,015 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%964,853 $144,728 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 30 $105,000 0BridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 26 Width$1,109,581 0 Does not include bridge improvements30%$332,87410%$110,95816%$177,53316%$177,533$4,700,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.8'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 201. Etna Nordic Foothills Back to Project ListPaved Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting PavementPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 201Lincoln CountyPaved Trail
202ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 21087.08 $189.69Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 11.62 $205,674Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 24Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 24Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 10,000 $180,000Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 12Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 6,250 $381,250 0HMATon$110.00 4,681 $514,947 12Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 21,090 $10,545 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 0 $0 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,292,416 $193,862 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 0 5 each way, 12 feet wideBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$1,486,278 030%$445,88310%$148,62816%$237,80416%$237,804$4,000,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =3'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =6'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =0'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =0.8'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =0.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =0.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =2.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 202. Star Valley Ranch State Land Loop Trail Back to Project ListPaved Trail Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineBike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadSubtotalPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs Bridge (S.F)202Lincoln CountyPaved Trail
203ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 26229.35Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 26,230 $13,115 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 26,230 $13,115 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 630 $28,980 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 624 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$55,210 030%$16,56310%$5,52116%$8,83416%$8,834$100,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 203. Muddy String Bikeway Back to Project ListBike Lane Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadSubtotalPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs Bridge (S.F)203Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
204ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 24573.09Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 16.93 $299,661Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 49,146 $34,402 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 10,930 $96,184 30Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 60,070 $216,252 30Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 17,840 $321,120Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 8,490 $399,030 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 4,250 $259,250 26HMATon$110.00 15,153 $1,666,875 10Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 98,290 $127,777Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 24,570 $12,285 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 24,570 $12,285 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 24,570 $12,285 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 590 $27,140 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 49,146 $206,414 0Drainage% of Cost 15%3,690,960 $553,644 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 588 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$4,244,604 030%$1,273,38110%$424,46016%$679,13716%$679,137$7,310,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 204. Bedford to Turnerville Bikeway Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 204Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
205ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 29127.01Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 29,130 $14,565 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 29,130 $14,565 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 700 $32,200 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 696 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$61,330 030%$18,39910%$6,13316%$9,81316%$9,813$110,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 205. Turnerville to Grover Back to Project ListBike Lane Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 205Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
206ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 15833.2Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 0Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 0Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 0Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 0HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 15,830 $7,915 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 15,830 $7,915 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 390 $17,940 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 384 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$33,770 030%$10,13110%$3,37716%$5,40316%$5,403$60,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 206. Pole Line Rd Bikeway Back to Project ListBike Lane Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 206Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
207ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 28141.07Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 21.97 $388,869Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 56,282 $39,398 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 12,510 $110,088 26Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 68,790 $247,644 34Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 20,430 $367,740Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 9,730 $457,310 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 4,860 $296,460 26HMATon$110.00 17,354 $1,908,903 10Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 112,560 $146,328Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 28,140 $14,070 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 28,140 $14,070 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 28,140 $14,070 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 680 $31,280 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 56,282 $236,385 0Drainage% of Cost 15%4,272,614 $640,892 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 672 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$4,913,506 030%$1,474,05210%$491,35116%$786,16116%$786,161$8,460,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 207. Auburn Loop Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 207Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
208ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 10761.48Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 8.40 $148,680Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 21,523 $15,066 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 4,790 $42,152 26Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 26,310 $94,716 34Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 7,810 $140,580Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 3,720 $174,840 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 1,860 $113,460 26HMATon$110.00 6,636 $729,987 10Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 43,050 $55,965Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,760 $5,380 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 10,760 $5,380 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 10,760 $5,380 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 270 $12,420 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 21,523 $90,396 0Drainage% of Cost 15%1,634,403 $245,160 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 264 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$1,879,563 030%$563,86910%$187,95616%$300,73016%$300,730$3,240,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 208. Afton School Bikeway Loop Trail Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 208Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
209ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 21156.57Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 12.15 $215,055Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 42,313 $29,619 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 9,410 $82,808 35Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 56,420 $203,112 25Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 13,160 $236,880Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 6,270 $294,690 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 3,130 $190,930 28HMATon$110.00 12,525 $1,377,716 8Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 84,630 $110,019Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 21,160 $10,580 1 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 21,160 $10,580 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 21,160 $10,580 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 510 $23,460 16New Fencing L.F.$4.20 42,313 $177,715 0Drainage% of Cost 15%2,973,744 $446,062 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 504 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$3,419,806 030%$1,025,94210%$341,98116%$547,16916%$547,169$5,890,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 209. Co Rd 135 Bikeway Back to Project ListWideningStop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 209Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
210ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 20971.68Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 60Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 36HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 20,970 $10,485 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 20,970 $10,485 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 510 $23,460 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 504 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$44,430 030%$13,32910%$4,44316%$7,10916%$7,109$80,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 210. Co Rd 204 Bikeway Back to Project ListBike Lane Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 210Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)
211ItemUnitUnit Cost Quantity Cost 18881.59Clearing and Grubbing Acre $17,700 0.00 $0Remove Existing Fencing L.F.$0.70 0 $0 60Removal of Existing Asphalt S.Y.$8.80 0 $0 60Grind Existing Asphalt S.Y.$3.60 0 $0 0Roadway/Trail Excavation C.Y.$18.00 0 $0Pit Run Aggregate C.Y.$47.00 0 $0 36Crushed Course Aggregate C.Y.$61.00 0 $0 36HMATon$110.00 0 $0 0Chip Seal S.Y.$1.30 0 $0Center Line Striping L.F.$0.50 0 $0 0 0 - No, 1 - YesFog Line Striping L.F.$0.50 18,880 $9,440 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBike Lane Striping L.F.$0.50 18,880 $9,440 1 0 - No, 1 - YesStop Bar L.F.$3.00 0 $0Traffic Control Signs (Stop, Yield)Each $850.00 0 $0 0Pavement Markings L.F.$46.00 460 $21,160 0New Fencing L.F.$4.20 0 $0 0Drainage% of Cost 15%0 $0 1 0 - No, 1 - YesBox Culvert L.F.$3,500.00 0 $0 456 500' spacing 72" tallBridgeS.F.$250.00 0 $0 0$40,040 030%$12,01210%$4,00416%$6,40616%$6,406$70,000HMA Pavement Density (pcf) =148 Project No.HMA Thickness (in) =4'' Funding:Crushed Course Aggregate Thickness (in) =4'' Type:Pit Run Aggregate Thickness (in) =8'' Roadway Excavation Depth (ft) =1.4'Number of Sidewalks (No.) =11.0Overlay HMA Thickness (in) =2.0Pavement Removal Width(ft) =2.0Gravel Shoulder Width(ft) =0.0Lincoln County Wyoming Back to SummaryTransportation Master Plan 211. Cokeville Bikeway Back to Project ListBike Lane Stop BarsCostsLength of SegmentROW Clearing NeededCleared ROWROW Clearing NeededTotal Pavement/Gravel WidthExisting Pavement/GravelPavement Width NeededCenter LineFog LineOutside Bike Lane LineOverall Assumptions:Avg. Stop Bar LengthTraffic Control SignsReplace Fence for New/Widen RoadPavement Markings (L.F.)Culvert Width (L.F)Subtotal Bridge (S.F)Items not included in estimateMobilizationPreconstruction EngineeringConstruction EngineeringTotal Project Costs 211Lincoln CountyCollector (ADT >2000 - 6' Shoulder)